Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre FS inodes getting full

Having more inodes on the OSTs will increase e2fsck time a bit, and reduce free space a bit, but is not otherwise harmful. Cheers, Andreas > On Nov 24, 2015, at 07:29, Jérôme BECOT wrote: > > Thanks for your answer. > > I am sorry I didn't thank you then. > > Does

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre FS inodes getting full

Thanks for your answer. I am sorry I didn't thank you then. Does reducing the average file size has an impact on the performances ? Is there a reasonable size where going beyond may make the filesystem unstable or so ? We are thinking of an average 100KB file size. Thank you again Le

Re: [lustre-discuss] Expanding a zfsonlinux OST pool

Thanks much for your reply, Olaf. Below for the answers. On 11/23/2015 4:35 PM, Faaland, Olaf P. wrote: Hello Bob, We did something similar - our MDS's used zpools based on spinning disks in JBODs and we switched to SSDs without bringing the filesystem down, using ZFS to replicate data. It