Re: [lustre-discuss] LNET Self-test

2017-02-05 Thread Patrick Farrell
Doug, It seems to me that's not true any more, with larger RPC sizes available. Is there some reason that's not true? - Patrick From: lustre-discuss on behalf of Oucharek, Doug S Sent:

Re: [lustre-discuss] LNET Self-test

2017-02-05 Thread Oucharek, Doug S
Yes, you can bump your concurrency. Size caps out at 1M because that is how LNet is setup to work. Going over 1M size would result in an unrealistic Lustre test. Doug > On Feb 5, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Jeff Johnson > wrote: > > Without seeing your entire

Re: [lustre-discuss] LNET Self-test

2017-02-05 Thread Jeff Johnson
Without seeing your entire command it is hard to say for sure but I would make sure your concurrency option is set to 8 for starters. --Jeff Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 5, 2017, at 11:30, Jon Tegner wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to use lnet selftest to evaluate network

Re: [lustre-discuss] LNET Self-test

2017-02-05 Thread Raj
You should be able to do concurrent streams using --concurrency option. I would try with 2/4/8. -RG On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 1:30 PM Jon Tegner wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to use lnet selftest to evaluate network performance on a > test setup (only two machines). Using e.g., iperf

[lustre-discuss] LNET Self-test

2017-02-05 Thread Jon Tegner
Hi, I'm trying to use lnet selftest to evaluate network performance on a test setup (only two machines). Using e.g., iperf or Netpipe I've managed to demonstrate the bandwidth of the underlying 10 Gbits/s network (and typically you reach the expected bandwidth as the packet size increases).