Re: [lustre-discuss] State of the upstream client

On May 23, 2017, at 11:15, E.S. Rosenberg wrote: > > Hi all, > So I may be asking for something that will anyhow be dealt with at LUG 2017 > but I actually would like to know. > > At LUG 2016 there was a talk that sounded very hopeful that the upstream > version of

Re: [lustre-discuss] seclabel

On May 19, 2017, at 08:47, Robin Humble wrote: > > Hi Sebastien, > > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 02:37:31PM +, Sebastien Buisson wrote: >> Le 17 mai 2017 à 16:16, Robin Humble a écrit : >>> I took a gander at the source and noticed that

[lustre-discuss] State of the upstream client

Hi all, So I may be asking for something that will anyhow be dealt with at LUG 2017 but I actually would like to know. At LUG 2016 there was a talk that sounded very hopeful that the upstream version of lustre was taking leaps and bounds to being in sync with the main Lustre project. Where are