Does mofed make a big difference vs. in-kernel ofed that is worth the effort?
Regards, Eli On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 6:08 PM, Alexander I Kulyavtsev <a...@fnal.gov> wrote: > Hi Megan, > > Standard lustre build works with in-kernel ofed. To use Mellanox ofed you > have to rebuild lustre: > > http://wiki.lustre.org/Compiling_Lustre > > Apparently there is version of lustre 2.10.4 built with mlx ofed in > whamcloud download area: > > https://downloads.whamcloud.com/public/lustre/lustre-2.10. > 4-ib/ > > > > What version did you try? > > > > Best regards, Alex. > > > > *From: *lustre-discuss <lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org> on > behalf of "Ms. Megan Larko" <dobsonu...@gmail.com> > *Date: *Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 10:26 AM > *To: *Lustre User Discussion Mailing List <lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > > > *Subject: *[lustre-discuss] MOFED 4.4-1.0.0.0 > > > > Hi, > > > > I have found that Lustre-2.10.4 works only with CentOS linux kernel > 3.10.0-693.x. and newer. I discovered that Mellanox MOFED 4.3(or > 4?)-1.0.1.0 (I'm not where I can verify the MOFED version number but it is > 4 and ending in "1.0.1.0") will not work with CentOS linux kernel > 3.10.0-8*. So I have a successful Lustre 2.10.4 with the "693" linux > kernel series and MOFED 4.3/4-1.0.1.0 > > > > So I will second the statement that the software version stack is indeed > "particular". > > > > Cheers, > > megan > > _______________________________________________ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > >
_______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
