Re: [lustre-discuss] Odd client behavior with mixed Lustre versions

2019-01-11 Thread Mohr Jr, Richard Frank (Rick Mohr)
Is it possible you have some incompatible ko2iblnd module parameters between the 2.8 servers and the 2.10 clients? If there was something causing LNet issues, that could possibly explain some of the symptoms you are seeing. -- Rick Mohr Senior HPC System Administrator National Institute for

Re: [lustre-discuss] LFS Quota

2019-01-11 Thread Harr, Cameron
When you're over the soft limit, you *should* see an '*' in the listing, as well as time left in the grace period. We've had mixed success with that actually working however. Cameron On 1/9/19 5:21 AM, Moreno Diego (ID SIS) wrote: Hi ANS, About the soft limits and not receiving any warning or

Re: [lustre-discuss] Kernel Module Build

2019-01-11 Thread Tauferner, Andrew T
> This looks clearly broken, and the reason why the rpmbuild is failing > to locate the file therein. You aren't running out of space or inodes > on this filesystem? No > Otherwise, you need to dig into why the tar creation is failing. I did > notice something strange in your earlier logs: >>

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre chown and create operations failing for certain UIDs

2019-01-11 Thread Russell Dekema
Good morning, I've been bitten by that one in the past too. This time I checked, and the md5sum of /etc/passwd is identical on the MDS nodes and the compute/login nodes. Cheers, Rusty D. On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 7:16 PM Harr, Cameron wrote: > > Russell, > > Your symptoms are a little different

Re: [lustre-discuss] Kernel Module Build

2019-01-11 Thread Degremont, Aurelien
I faced the same issue recently with 2.12, a 4.14 Kernel and a very custom EL7 distro. I ended up making the tarball by hand and ran the rpmbuild command myself. Aurélien Le 11/01/2019 05:19, « lustre-discuss au nom de Andreas Dilger » a écrit : On Jan 10, 2019, at 18:13, Tauferner,