Re: [lustre-discuss] EL9

2023-05-03 Thread Peter Jones via lustre-discuss
Yes. We will officially support RHEL9.x servers in Lustre 2.16. On 2023-05-03, 8:52 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Lana Deere via lustre-discuss" mailto:lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org> on behalf of lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > wrote: Is

Re: [lustre-discuss] question mark when listing file after the upgrade

2023-05-03 Thread Andreas Dilger via lustre-discuss
This looks like https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-16655 causing problems after the upgrade from 2.12.x to 2.15.[012] breaking the Object Index files. A patch for this has already been landed to b2_15 and will be included in 2.15.3. If you've hit this issue, then you need to backup/delete the

Re: [lustre-discuss] question mark when listing file after the upgrade

2023-05-03 Thread Colin Faber via lustre-discuss
Hi, What does your client log indicate? (dmesg / syslog) On Wed, May 3, 2023, 7:32 AM Jane Liu via lustre-discuss < lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm writing to ask for your help on one issue we observed after a major > upgrade of a large Lustre system from RHEL7 + 2.12.9

Re: [lustre-discuss] EL9

2023-05-03 Thread Lana Deere via lustre-discuss
Is there any update on the status of Lustre server support on EL9? .. Lana (lana.de...@gmail.com) ___ lustre-discuss mailing list lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

[lustre-discuss] question mark when listing file after the upgrade

2023-05-03 Thread Jane Liu via lustre-discuss
Hello, I'm writing to ask for your help on one issue we observed after a major upgrade of a large Lustre system from RHEL7 + 2.12.9 to RHEL8 + 2.15.2. Basically we preserved MDT disk (VDisk on a VM) and also all OST disk (JBOD) in RHEL7 and then reinstalled RHEL8 OS and then attached those

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre kernel space or user space

2023-05-03 Thread Tancheff, Shaun via lustre-discuss
A bit dated but should give a reasonable overview: https://wiki.lustre.org/images/d/da/LUG08-Lustre-NFS.pdf I would prefer NFSv4 over v3. Expect that NFS performance will be less than Lustre native. From: Nick dan Date: Wednesday, May 3, 2023 at 5:14 PM To: "Tancheff, Shaun" ,

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre kernel space or user space

2023-05-03 Thread Nick dan via lustre-discuss
Hi Can you explain in detail how Lustre can be used with NFS? Do you mean that the storage will be lustre and client will be mounted with NFS? Will this affect the performance? Thanks and regards Nick On Wed, 3 May 2023 at 14:30, Tancheff, Shaun wrote: > Lustre is an in-kernel file system. >

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre kernel space or user space

2023-05-03 Thread Tancheff, Shaun via lustre-discuss
Lustre is an in-kernel file system. I am not aware of a FUSE mountable Lustre, it would be very likely to have an unacceptable performance profile. There is also method to re-export as an NFS share to enable NFS clients access to data stored on Lustre, an example use case is when client OS

[lustre-discuss] Lustre kernel space or user space

2023-05-03 Thread Nick dan via lustre-discuss
Hi I had a few questions. 1. Is lustre storage and client mounted in kernel space or user space? 2. Can lustre be mounted with fuse? What is the use of mounting lustre with fuse? Thanks and regards, Nick ___ lustre-discuss mailing list