Re: [lustre-discuss] [EXTERNAL] Re: Data recovery with lost MDT data

2023-09-22 Thread Vicker, Darby J. (JSC-EG111)[Jacobs Technology, Inc.] via lustre-discuss
I’m only showing you the last 10 directories below but there are about 30 or 40 directories with a pretty uniform distribution between 6/20 and now. If it was a situation where we had been rolled back to 6/20 but directories were starting to be updated again, there should be a big gap with no u

Re: [lustre-discuss] [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Re: Lustre 2.15.3: patching the kernel fails

2023-09-22 Thread Andreas Dilger via lustre-discuss
On Sep 22, 2023, at 01:45, Jan Andersen mailto:j...@comind.io>> wrote: Hi Andreas, Thank you for your insightful reply. I didn't know Rocky; I see there's a version 9 as well - is ver 8 better, since it is more mature? There is an el9.2 ldiskfs series that would likely also apply to the Rocky9

Re: [lustre-discuss] [EXTERNAL] Re: Data recovery with lost MDT data

2023-09-22 Thread Andreas Dilger via lustre-discuss
On Sep 21, 2023, at 16:06, Vicker, Darby J. (JSC-EG111)[Jacobs Technology, Inc.] mailto:darby.vicke...@nasa.gov>> wrote: I knew an lfsck would identify the orphaned objects. That’s great that it will move those objects to an area we can triage. With ownership still intact (and I assume time s