Re: [lustre-discuss] 2.15.4 o2iblnd on RoCEv2?

2024-01-10 Thread Andreas Dilger via lustre-discuss
Granted that I'm not an LNet expert, but "errno: -1 descr: cannot parse net '<255:65535>' " doesn't immediately lead me to the same conclusion as if "unknown internface 'ib0' " were printed for the error message. Also "errno: -1" is "-EPERM = Operation not permitted", and doesn't give the same

Re: [lustre-discuss] 2.15.4 o2iblnd on RoCEv2?

2024-01-10 Thread Jeff Johnson
A LU ticket and patch for lnetctl or for me being an under-caffeinated idiot? ;-) On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 12:06 PM Andreas Dilger wrote: > > It would seem that the error message could be improved in this case? Could > you file an LU ticket for that with the reproducer below, and ideally along

Re: [lustre-discuss] [EXTERNAL] [BULK] MDS hardware - NVME?

2024-01-10 Thread Cameron Harr via lustre-discuss
On 1/10/24 11:59, Thomas Roth via lustre-discuss wrote: Actually we had MDTs on software raid-1 *connecting two JBODs* for quite some time - worked surprisingly well and stable. I'm glad it's working for you! Hmm, if you have your MDTs on a zpool of mirrors aka raid-10, wouldn't going

Re: [lustre-discuss] 2.15.4 o2iblnd on RoCEv2?

2024-01-10 Thread Andreas Dilger via lustre-discuss
It would seem that the error message could be improved in this case? Could you file an LU ticket for that with the reproducer below, and ideally along with a patch? Cheers, Andreas > On Jan 10, 2024, at 11:37, Jeff Johnson > wrote: > > Man am I an idiot. Been up all night too many nights

Re: [lustre-discuss] [EXTERNAL] [BULK] MDS hardware - NVME?

2024-01-10 Thread Thomas Roth via lustre-discuss
Actually we had MDTs on software raid-1 *connecting two JBODs* for quite some time - worked surprisingly well and stable. Still, personally I would prefer ZFS anytime. Nowadays we have all our OSTs are on ZFS, very stable. Of course, a look at all the possible ZFS parameters tells me that

Re: [lustre-discuss] 2.15.4 o2iblnd on RoCEv2?

2024-01-10 Thread Jeff Johnson
Man am I an idiot. Been up all night too many nights in a row and not enough coffee. It helps if you use the correct --net designation. I was typing ib0 instead of o2ib0. Declaring as o2ib0 works fine. (cleanup from previous) lctl net down && lustre_rmmod (new attempt) modprobe lnet -v lnetctl

Re: [lustre-discuss] Dropped support for Ubuntu?

2024-01-10 Thread Peter Jones via lustre-discuss
Ubuntu 22.04 client packages are now on the download site From: Ramiro Alba Queipo Date: Wednesday, January 10, 2024 at 6:27 AM To: Peter Jones Cc: "lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org" Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] Dropped support for Ubuntu? Peter, That's great. Thank you very much Best

Re: [lustre-discuss] Dropped support for Ubuntu?

2024-01-10 Thread Ramiro Alba Queipo
Peter, That's great. Thank you very much Best regards El mié, 10 ene 2024, 15:04, Peter Jones escribió: > Sorry about that. It’s just an oversight due to us trying to wrap up the > release ahead of the holidays. I’ve corrected the changelog and I’ll get > the packages corrected shortly (it

Re: [lustre-discuss] Dropped support for Ubuntu?

2024-01-10 Thread Peter Jones via lustre-discuss
Sorry about that. It’s just an oversight due to us trying to wrap up the release ahead of the holidays. I’ve corrected the changelog and I’ll get the packages corrected shortly (it looks like ubuntu 2004 was accidentally copied across instead of 2204). If you need the packages urgently then

[lustre-discuss] Dropped support for Ubuntu?

2024-01-10 Thread Ramiro Alba Queipo
Hi all, At the latest LTS release (2.15.4) I can not see packages for ubuntu 22.04 nor explicit mention support for Ubuntu client at 'Lustre 2.15.4 Changelog' (though it is mentioned at https://wiki.whamcloud.com/display/PUB/Lustre+Support+Matrix), as in previous releases. Does that means that

[lustre-discuss] Symbols not found in newly built lustre?

2024-01-10 Thread Jan Andersen
I am running Rocky 8.9 (uname -r: 4.18.0-513.9.1.el8_9.x86_64) and have, apparently successfully, built the lustre rpms: [root@mds lustre-release]# ll *2.15.4-1.el8.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 4640828 Jan 10 09:19 kmod-lustre-2.15.4-1.el8.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 42524976 Jan