Re: [lustre-discuss] how to set max_pages_per_rpc (I have done something wrong and need help)

2017-11-23 Thread Harald van Pee
Hi, I have done lctl set_param -d lctl conf_param -d on the mgs/mdt after this all problems are gone and all clients are able to mount the lustre filesystem again. Best Harald On Thursday 16 November 2017 15:10:43 Harald van Pee wrote: > Thank you, > > I will start next week a

Re: [lustre-discuss] how to set max_pages_per_rpc (I have done something wrong and need help)

2017-11-16 Thread Harald van Pee
Thank you, I will start next week and report what helps. Unfortunately in this cluster we have to wait with the upgrade to 2.10.1 until next year. Best whishes Harald On Wednesday 15 November 2017 23:09:49 Dilger, Andreas wrote: > On Nov 15, 2017, at 12:56, Harald van Pee <p...@his

Re: [lustre-discuss] how to set max_pages_per_rpc (I have done something wrong and need help)

2017-11-15 Thread Harald van Pee
round this by erasing the configuration parameters > (see Lustre manual). > > Cheers, Andreas > > On Nov 15, 2017, at 09:26, Harald van Pee > <p...@hiskp.uni-bonn.de<mailto:p...@hiskp.uni-bonn.de>> wrote: > > Here are more informations: > > if I try to moun

Re: [lustre-discuss] Dependency errors with Lustre 2.10.1 packages

2017-11-15 Thread Harald van Pee
Hi, do you have installed the wc version of e2fsprogs? I would expect this solves at least most of the dependenies. Harald On Wednesday 15 November 2017 19:40:38 Michael Watters wrote: > I am attempting to install lustre packages on a new OST node running > CentOS 7.4.1708 and it appears that

[lustre-discuss] mgs stops working after accidently setting a non existing paramter (no device for)

2017-11-15 Thread Harald van Pee
by setting lctl conf_param hiskp3-OST.osc.max_pages_per_rpc=0 ?? And if so, how I have to proceed after that command? Thanks in advance Harald On Wednesday 15 November 2017 17:26:25 Harald van Pee wrote: > Here are more informations: > > if I try to mount the filesystem on the client I ge

Re: [lustre-discuss] how to set max_pages_per_rpc (I have done something wrong and need help)

2017-11-15 Thread Harald van Pee
()) Skipped 3 previous similar messages kernel: [ 5028.550906] Lustre: Unmounted hiskp3-client kernel: [ 5028.551407] LustreError: 3815:0: (obd_mount.c:1340:lustre_fill_super()) Unable to mount (-22) On Wednesday 15 November 2017 16:06:29 Harald van Pee wrote: > Dear all, > > I wa

[lustre-discuss] how to set max_pages_per_rpc (I have done something wrong and need help)

2017-11-15 Thread Harald van Pee
Dear all, I want to set max_pages_per_rpc to 64 instead of 256 lustre mgs/mdt version 2.53 lustre oss version 2.53 lustre client 2.6 on client I have done: lctl get_param osc.hiskp3-OST*.max_pages_per_rpc osc.hiskp3-OST0001-osc-88105dba4800.max_pages_per_rpc=256

Re: [lustre-discuss] lustre 2.10.1 MOFED 4.1 QDR/FDR mixing

2017-11-14 Thread Harald van Pee
: > Harald, > > As long as your new servers and clients all have the same settings in their > config files as your currently running configuration you should be fine. > > --Jeff > > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Harald van Pee <p...@hiskp.uni-bonn.de> > &g

[lustre-discuss] lustre 2.10.1 MOFED 4.1 QDR/FDR mixing

2017-11-14 Thread Harald van Pee
Dear all, I have installed lustre 2.10.1 from source with MOFED 4.1. mdt/mgs and oss run on centos 7.4 clients on debian 9 (kernel 4.9) our test (cluster 1x mgs/mdt + 1x oss + 1x client) all with mellanox ib qdr nics runs without problems on a mellanox fdr switch. Now we have additional clients

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre and OFED

2017-07-28 Thread Harald van Pee
Hello On Friday 28 July 2017 15:48:12 Ben Evans wrote: > Eli, just to clarify are you talking about using the in-kernel OFED vs. a > vendor (Mellanox) OFED, or In our case we are using the OFED of the debian distribution used. > are you talking about using the ConnectX-3 > hardware in IPoIB

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre and OFED

2017-07-27 Thread Harald van Pee
Hi Eli, we are running lustre without OFED on debian client and server. With lustre 2.4.0 on client and servers no problem at all since years. With lustre 2.5.3 on servers and 2.6. 92 no problems at least for monthes. with lustre 2.5.3 on servers and 2.7 on clients allways ib connection loss.

Re: [lustre-discuss] Clients looses IB connection to OSS.

2017-07-19 Thread Harald van Pee
Hi, I just wondering if there is also a problem with lustre 2.7 and mellanox ib even if there is no infiniband router. We are using lustre with infiniband as the only lnet connection. Lustre 2.5.3 on the server side and 2.6 on clients runs stable for monthes, but we see a memory leak

[Lustre-discuss] new ost not recognized

2008-04-27 Thread Harald van Pee
the same was on mds. It seems that on one client and on the mds the new osts are not recognized. Can anybody explain what happens, and give me a hint how I can use the new disk space? I use version 1.6.0.1 on servers and version 1.6.1 on clients Thanks in advance Harald -- Harald van Pee

Re: [Lustre-discuss] files/directories are temporarily unavailable on patchless clients

2008-03-04 Thread Harald van Pee
the filesystem checks in parallel. Thanks in advance Harald On Monday 21 January 2008 11:55 pm, Andreas Dilger wrote: On Jan 21, 2008 18:55 +0100, Harald van Pee wrote: The directory is just not there! Directory or file not found. in my opinion there is no error message on the clients

Re: [Lustre-discuss] files/directories are temporarily unavailable on patchless clients

2008-01-25 Thread Harald van Pee
is a supported configuration right? And therefore updating the clients asap would be a good idea! Any objections about that? Harald -- Harald van Pee Helmholtz-Institut fuer Strahlen- und Kernphysik der Universitaet Bonn ___ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre