Re: [lustre-discuss] nodemap exports

2024-06-19 Thread Sebastien Buisson via lustre-discuss
Hi, I am not sure the NIDs displayed under ‘exports’ and in the logs are the actual NIDs used to communicate with, maybe they are just identifiers to describe the peers. If you want to restrict a client to a given LNet network for a given mount point, you can use the ‘-o network=’ mount

Re: [lustre-discuss] Small bug in 2.14 debian/rules

2022-06-02 Thread Sebastien Buisson via lustre-discuss
Thanks for reporting this. I created Jira ticket LU-15908 (https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-15908), and pushed patch https://review.whamcloud.com/47512 to fix the problem. Cheers, Sebastien. > Le 2 juin 2022 à 11:01, Åke Sandgren a écrit : > > Sorry, meant master not 2.14, and it's

Re: [lustre-discuss] how to unsquash users

2022-05-23 Thread Sebastien Buisson via lustre-discuss
That is correct, in your case you should set admin and trusted to 1 on your default nodemap. But that is not really the recommended way to work with nodemaps. The default nodemap should be restrictive so that unknown clients ending up in this group are not granted any privileges. And then you

Re: [lustre-discuss] how to unsquash users

2022-05-20 Thread Sebastien Buisson via lustre-discuss
Hi, It looks like you did not set properties on the default nodemap, which gets involved for your machine not in the 10.0.1.[35-38] range. When in use, the nodemap feature does not change anything about UID/GID of files as stored on servers, it just changes (maps) the way clients see them.

Re: [lustre-discuss] Changelogs and jobstats with multitenancy and multiple cluster mounts

2021-11-24 Thread Sebastien Buisson via lustre-discuss
Hi, Lustre Changelogs are properly generated when a client is accessing Lustre via a subdirectory mount. And the changelogs can also be retrieved as expected. What is not possible today is to configure the changelogs mask on a per-directory basis. This setting is global to each MDT. So what

Re: [lustre-discuss] nodemap switching fails

2021-05-25 Thread Sebastien Buisson via lustre-discuss
Hi Thomas, The phenomenon you observe is likely due to a caching effect on client side. If you clear the cache with the following command on your clients after the nodemap definitions have been updated, you should be able to see what you expect: client# lctl set_param