On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:04:57AM -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
I saw recommendation to limit ost_num_threads but it is
deprecated. Should
I limit oss_num_threads instead?
Yes. (they are the same thing anyway)
Thanks Oleg. One more question, this limit is per kernel module or per OST
mount?
Hello!
On Sep 23, 2009, at 7:47 AM, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
I limit oss_num_threads instead?
Yes. (they are the same thing anyway)
Thanks Oleg. One more question, this limit is per kernel module or
per OST
mount? E.g., I have 1 physical server that hosts 2 OST servers -
OST0, OST1.
This
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 04:17:54PM -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
If you bring down the load on the OSTs (read this list, recently
there were
several methods discussed like bringing down number of service threads)
that should help.
Thanks. I got a question regarding number of service threads.
Hello!
On Sep 22, 2009, at 7:10 AM, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 04:17:54PM -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
If you bring down the load on the OSTs (read this list, recently
there were
several methods discussed like bringing down number of service
threads)
that should help.
Hello,
is it possible to optimize Lustre so that is supports really large directories
(with 30k small files in it)? We have 8 physical clients which process jpeg
files stored on Lustre volume and I get sooner or later client freezes - ls in
Lustre directory waits forever. I there something I
On Thursday 17 September 2009, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
Hello,
is it possible to optimize Lustre so that is supports really large
directories (with 30k small files in it)? We have 8 physical clients which
process jpeg files stored on Lustre volume and I get sooner or later client
freezes - ls
Hello!
On Sep 17, 2009, at 7:28 AM, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
LustreError: 11-0: an error occurred while communicating with
x.x@tcp.
The mds_connect operation failed with -16
Lustre: Request x112815827 sent from stable-OST0001-osc-
8802855b7800 to
NID x.x@tcp 100s ago has timed
