transfer using Lustre is interesting.
Arden
--- On Mon, 8/10/09, Jim McCusker james.mccus...@yale.edu wrote:
From: Jim McCusker james.mccus...@yale.edu
Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Large scale delete results in lag on clients
To: Oleg Drokin oleg.dro...@sun.com
Cc: lustre-discuss lustre
Just a quick update: the lag is back. It seems to hold off for about
24 hours, then things get so slow that our web applications time out.
Is there a delay before freeing inodes commences after a reboot, or is
this officially now Something Else? Should I just tough it out for now
and see if it
On Monday, August 10, 2009, Oleg Drokin oleg.dro...@sun.com wrote:
What lustre version is it now?
We used to have uncontrolled unlinking where OSTs might get swamped with
unlink requests.
Now we limit to 8 unlinks to OST at any one time. This slows down the
deletion process, but at least
Hello!
On Aug 10, 2009, at 11:03 PM, Jim McCusker wrote:
On Monday, August 10, 2009, Oleg Drokin oleg.dro...@sun.com wrote:
What lustre version is it now?
We used to have uncontrolled unlinking where OSTs might get swamped
with
unlink requests.
Now we limit to 8 unlinks to OST at any
--- On Thu, 8/6/09, Andreas Dilger adil...@sun.com wrote:
From: Andreas Dilger adil...@sun.com
Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Large scale delete results in lag on clients
To: Jim McCusker james.mccus...@yale.edu
Cc: lustre-discuss lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
Date: Thursday, August 6
--- On Fri, 8/7/09, Jim McCusker james.mccus...@yale.edu wrote:
From: Jim McCusker james.mccus...@yale.edu
Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Large scale delete results in lag on clients
To: lustre-discuss lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
Date: Friday, August 7, 2009, 5:25 AM
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009
We have a 15 TB luster volume across 4 OSTs and we recently deleted over 4
million files from it in order to free up the 80 GB MDT/MDS (going from 100%
capacity on it to 81%. As a result, after the rm completed, there is
significant lag on most file system operations (but fast access once it
On Aug 06, 2009 15:08 -0400, Jim McCusker wrote:
We have a 15 TB luster volume across 4 OSTs and we recently deleted over 4
million files from it in order to free up the 80 GB MDT/MDS (going from 100%
capacity on it to 81%. As a result, after the rm completed, there is
significant lag on most
