On Jul 14, 2009 21:05 +0200, tao.a...@nokia.com wrote:
> A related but different question, Lustre 2.0 will have replication.
> Under 2.0 (with replication), what would happen if the primary node
> goes down? Would the backup node be able to take over the load in
> shorter period of time? Or is
-discuss] Lustre DRBD failover time
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 17:54 +0200, tao.a...@nokia.com wrote:
>
> Hi, all,
>
> I am evaluating Lustre with DRBD failover, and experiencing about 2
> minutes in OSS failover time to switch to the secondary node.
What is this 2 minutes inclu
tao.a...@nokia.com wrote:
>
> Hi, all,
>
> I am evaluating Lustre with DRBD failover, and experiencing about 2
> minutes in OSS failover time to switch to the secondary node. Has
> anyone have the similar observation (so that we can conclude this should
> be expected), or if there is some p
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 17:54 +0200, tao.a...@nokia.com wrote:
>
> Hi, all,
>
> I am evaluating Lustre with DRBD failover, and experiencing about 2
> minutes in OSS failover time to switch to the secondary node.
What is this 2 minutes including? Just the time for the second OSS to
mount the dis
Hi, all,
I am evaluating Lustre with DRBD failover, and experiencing about 2 minutes in
OSS failover time to switch to the secondary node. Has anyone have the similar
observation (so that we can conclude this should be expected), or if there is
some parameters that I should tune to reduce tha
