What was your conclusion? What is a good HA solution with Lustre? I am
hoping SNS will be a big push for the next year
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Jason Rappleye wrote:
>
> On May 4, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Charles Taylor wrote:
>
>>
>> We are dipping our toes into the waters of Lustre HA using
>
On May 4, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Charles Taylor wrote:
>
> We are dipping our toes into the waters of Lustre HA using
> pacemaker. We have 16 7.2 TB OSTs across 4 OSSs (4 OSTs each).
> The four OSSs are broken out into two dual-active pairs running Lustre
> 1.8.5.Mostly, the water is
We're investigating Pacemaker HA setup here too, so I'm interested in
your findings, and I hope I can help a little here.
1. So it seems like totem is not responding on some, but still running
on others, if they take the initiative to stonith.
I would investigate bumping up or adding some paramet
We are dipping our toes into the waters of Lustre HA using
pacemaker. We have 16 7.2 TB OSTs across 4 OSSs (4 OSTs each).
The four OSSs are broken out into two dual-active pairs running Lustre
1.8.5.Mostly, the water is fine but we've encountered a few
surprises.
1. An 8-client
