the lustre downs for networks maintenance.
From: Michael Shuey
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 2:17 PM
To: Alfonso Pardo
Cc: Brian O'Connor ; WC-Discuss ; lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces
That will probably be slow - the machine you
Yes I have two swtiches, one to the bond0 interface and other switch to the
second bond1 interface.
From: Indivar Nair
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 8:05 PM
To: Alfonso Pardo
Cc: Michael Shuey ; WC-Discuss ; lustre-discuss
Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces
Hi
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
*Subject:* Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces
Hi Alfonso,
I guess, you have two switches, with 2 interfaces (bond0) connected to one
switch and the other 2 interfaces (bond1) to the second switch.
---
What you need to do is merge
-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces
Then follow the instructions in my earlier mail.
No need to have bond0 and bond1.
You will achieve high-availability even with one bonded interface.
Cheers,
Indivar Nair
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Alfonso Pardo alfonso.pa...@ciemat.es wrote
*To:* Alfonso Pardo alfonso.pa...@ciemat.es
*Cc:* Michael Shuey sh...@purdue.edu ;
lustre-discusslustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
*Subject:* Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces
Then follow the instructions in my earlier mail.
No need to have bond0 and bond1.
You will achieve high
: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 1:09 AM
To: 'Alfonso Pardo' ; 'Michael Shuey'
Cc: 'WC-Discuss' ; mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
Subject: RE: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces
Unless something has changed in the new versions of lustre, I don't think
lustre can do failover between
: *WC-Discuss; lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
*Subject: *Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces
thank Michael,
This is my second step, I will change the lnet with “options lnet
networks=tcp0(bond0,bond1)” because my machines has 4 nics. I have a
bond0 and bond1 with LACP. I need
: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces
On 06/26/2013 04:16 PM, Alfonso Pardo wrote:
But if I configure the OST assigning to the first interface of the
OSS (bond0) and as failover OSS the second inteface of the OSS. If the
bond0 network down, the client will try to connect
-discuss@lists.lustre.**orglustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces
On 06/26/2013 04:16 PM, Alfonso Pardo wrote:
But if I configure the OST assigning to the first interface of the
OSS (bond0) and as failover OSS the second inteface
-discuss@lists.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces
On 06/26/2013 04:16 PM, Alfonso Pardo wrote:
But if I configure the OST assigning to the first interface of the
OSS (bond0) and as failover OSS the second inteface of the OSS. If the
bond0 network
hello friends,
I need to comunicate my OSS by two ethernet TCP interfaces: eth0 and eth1.
I have configured this feature in my modprobe.d with:
“options lnet networks=tcp0(eth0,eth1)”
And I can see two interfaces with:
lctl --net tcp interface_list
sa-d4-01.ceta-ciemat.es:
Different interfaces need to be declared with different LNET networks -
something like networks=tcp0(eth0),tcp1(eth1). Of course, that assumes
your clients are configured to use a mix of tcp0 and tcp1 for connections
(with each client only using one of the two). This is really only useful
in
@lists.lustre.org ; WC-Discuss
Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces
Different interfaces need to be declared with different LNET networks -
something like networks=tcp0(eth0),tcp1(eth1). Of course, that assumes your
clients are configured to use a mix of tcp0 and tcp1
@lists.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces
thank Michael,
This is my second step, I will change the lnet with “options lnet
networks=tcp0(bond0,bond1)” because my machines has 4 nics. I have a bond0 and
bond1 with LACP. I need to comunicate the clients with two network
14 matches
Mail list logo
