Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre playground in VirtualBox?

2009-08-12 Thread Isaac Huang
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 03:39:52PM +0200, Wolfgang Stief wrote: Hi out there! Before I start installing and fiddling around: Are there any reasons AGAINST setting up a Lustre playground in a VirtualBox environment? I just want to play around w/ recovery and debugging situations and

[Lustre-discuss] Lustre playground in VirtualBox?

2009-08-10 Thread Wolfgang Stief
Hi out there! Before I start installing and fiddling around: Are there any reasons AGAINST setting up a Lustre playground in a VirtualBox environment? I just want to play around w/ recovery and debugging situations and upgrades. No performance required at all. Anybody already set up a virtual

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre playground in VirtualBox?

2009-08-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 15:39 +0200, Wolfgang Stief wrote: Hi out there! Before I start installing and fiddling around: Are there any reasons AGAINST setting up a Lustre playground in a VirtualBox environment? I just want to play around w/ recovery and debugging situations and upgrades. No

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre playground in VirtualBox?

2009-08-10 Thread Dr. Hung-Sheng Tsao (LaoTsao)
IMHO, one just need 64-bit support Wolfgang Stief wrote: Hi out there! Before I start installing and fiddling around: Are there any reasons AGAINST setting up a Lustre playground in a VirtualBox environment? I just want to play around w/ recovery and debugging situations and upgrades. No

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre playground in VirtualBox?

2009-08-10 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello! On Aug 10, 2009, at 9:39 AM, Wolfgang Stief wrote: Before I start installing and fiddling around: Are there any reasons AGAINST setting up a Lustre playground in a VirtualBox environment? I just want to play around w/ recovery and debugging situations and upgrades. No performance

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre playground in VirtualBox?

2009-08-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 10:58 -0400, Dr. Hung-Sheng Tsao (LaoTsao) wrote: IMHO, one just need 64-bit support Not at all. 32-bit (i.e. i[56]86) works just fine. b. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Lustre-discuss