On Wednesday, September 15, 2010, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On 2010-09-15, at 13:32, Brock Palen wrote:
> > Thanks that is great to know. Is there much risk to try with 1.8 and
> > then back off to 1.6 if there are issues? Risk of data loss?
>
> We do not test/support formatting at a higher Lustre
On 2010-09-15, at 13:32, Brock Palen wrote:
> Thanks that is great to know. Is there much risk to try with 1.8 and then
> back off to 1.6 if there are issues? Risk of data loss?
We do not test/support formatting at a higher Lustre version, and then
downgrading below the original version used f
On 2010-09-15, at 12:36, Brock Palen wrote:
> We have a filesystem that we can't take down for a while to upgrade the oss's
> they are running 1.6.x we do have a need to quickly add some storage to it,
> and thus the new server would have 1.8.x
>
> Is there any problems with this? I know 1
We have a filesystem that we can't take down for a while to upgrade the oss's
they are running 1.6.x we do have a need to quickly add some storage to it,
and thus the new server would have 1.8.x
Is there any problems with this? I know 1.6.x isn't supported anymore and we
would like to mov
