Hello, my good man!
2009/11/20 Oleg Drokin oleg.dro...@sun.com
Yes, I think this does match bug 2969 behavior.
We add entry to dcache without lock (not visible in the trace you
provided). Then we do rename, then we do some sort of stat on a renamed
entry and reobtain the lock. Then we do
Lustre serves us very very well. As Phil points out, these sort of bugs are
not show stoppers for us, we report them to improve the code.
We have 30oss's and ~300TB of storage under it.
--
Dr Stuart Midgley
sdm...@gmail.com
On 22/11/2009, at 17:24 , Phil Schwan wrote:
Hello, my good
Hello old friends! I return with a gift, like an almost-forgotten
uncle visiting from a faraway land.
I have an interesting issue, on 1.6.6:
# cat /proc/fs/lustre/version
lustre: 1.6.6
kernel: patchless
build:
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 20:06 +0800, Phil Schwan wrote:
Hello old friends!
Heya phik.
I return with a gift, like an almost-forgotten
uncle visiting from a faraway land.
Yay!
- one task creates a foo.working directory, does all its work
inside, then renames it to foo.done
- another task
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 21:09 +0800, Phil Schwan wrote:
G'day Brian! Glad to see you've stuck around!
:-)
It should be, except it isn't.
Don't ya just hate those?
Your steps are correct, I believe (Stu
may correct me), but we also tried that without any luck.
Hrm. Must be more subtle
Hello!
On Nov 19, 2009, at 7:06 AM, Phil Schwan wrote:
Hello old friends! I return with a gift, like an almost-forgotten
uncle visiting from a faraway land.
Long time no see! ;)
I have an interesting issue, on 1.6.6:
# cat /proc/fs/lustre/version
lustre: 1.6.6
kernel: patchless
build:
