On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:51 AM, Christopher J. Morrone
wrote:
> On 08/26/2016 12:48 PM, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>
> > (it's best to be written by third parties anyway since once you work too
> much
> > on some code, you take too many things for granted/think they are
> obvious,
>
On 08/26/2016 12:48 PM, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> (it's best to be written by third parties anyway since once you work too much
> on some code, you take too many things for granted/think they are obvious,
> and then the end result has gaps that make it hard on the outsiders).
That is an common excuse
On Aug 16, 2016, at 6:55 AM, E.S. Rosenberg wrote:
> I just found this paper:
> http://wiki.lustre.org/images/d/da/Understanding_Lustre_Filesystem_Internals.pdf
>
> It looks interesting but it deals with lustre 1.6 so I am not sure how
> relevant it still is.
Well, I believe it deals with
> On Aug 16, 2016, at 6:55 AM, E.S. Rosenberg
> wrote:
>
> I just found this paper:
> http://wiki.lustre.org/images/d/da/Understanding_Lustre_Filesystem_Internals.pdf
>
> It looks interesting but it deals with lustre 1.6 so I am not sure how
> relevant it still
I just found this paper:
http://wiki.lustre.org/images/d/da/Understanding_Lustre_Filesystem_Internals.pdf
It looks interesting but it deals with lustre 1.6 so I am not sure how
relevant it still is.
Thanks,
Eli
___
lustre-discuss mailing list