Re: [lustre-discuss] Does an updated version exist?

2016-09-28 Thread E.S. Rosenberg
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:51 AM, Christopher J. Morrone wrote: > On 08/26/2016 12:48 PM, Oleg Drokin wrote: > > > (it's best to be written by third parties anyway since once you work too > much > > on some code, you take too many things for granted/think they are > obvious, >

Re: [lustre-discuss] Does an updated version exist?

2016-08-26 Thread Christopher J. Morrone
On 08/26/2016 12:48 PM, Oleg Drokin wrote: > (it's best to be written by third parties anyway since once you work too much > on some code, you take too many things for granted/think they are obvious, > and then the end result has gaps that make it hard on the outsiders). That is an common excuse

Re: [lustre-discuss] Does an updated version exist?

2016-08-26 Thread Oleg Drokin
On Aug 16, 2016, at 6:55 AM, E.S. Rosenberg wrote: > I just found this paper: > http://wiki.lustre.org/images/d/da/Understanding_Lustre_Filesystem_Internals.pdf > > It looks interesting but it deals with lustre 1.6 so I am not sure how > relevant it still is. Well, I believe it deals with

Re: [lustre-discuss] Does an updated version exist?

2016-08-16 Thread Mohr Jr, Richard Frank (Rick Mohr)
> On Aug 16, 2016, at 6:55 AM, E.S. Rosenberg > wrote: > > I just found this paper: > http://wiki.lustre.org/images/d/da/Understanding_Lustre_Filesystem_Internals.pdf > > It looks interesting but it deals with lustre 1.6 so I am not sure how > relevant it still

[lustre-discuss] Does an updated version exist?

2016-08-16 Thread E.S. Rosenberg
I just found this paper: http://wiki.lustre.org/images/d/da/Understanding_Lustre_Filesystem_Internals.pdf It looks interesting but it deals with lustre 1.6 so I am not sure how relevant it still is. Thanks, Eli ___ lustre-discuss mailing list