dkms is much more convenient if you plan to stay up to date with kernel
patching.
You do not need to rebuild a new kmod rpm every time yum upate will
upgrade your kernel to latest patch level,
also I do not like that weak-updates kernel module solution (with
symbolic links).
I am using dkms
Hi Brian,
I consider build processes somewhat fragile, especially when you expect to get
the same results across a large number of hosts, like a set of Lustre servers.
As a result, I favor building a single set of RPMs, testing them, and then
pushing an update to the production servers. So
All,
I have been watching some of the discussions/issues folks have with
building lustre and I am wondering what the consensus is on the two
approaches.
Myself, I have been building my own RPMs for some time and it seemed to
me that the general direction of linux was to move toward kmod and
