Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre-2.9 / ZFS-0.7.0 tuning recommendations

orts running to match the IO potential. > > Thanks, > Keith > > -Original Message- > From: lustre-discuss [mailto:lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org] On > Behalf Of Dilger, Andreas > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 12:46 AM > To: Nathan R.M. Crawford <nrcra...@

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre-2.9 / ZFS-0.7.0 tuning recommendations

Hi Andreas, Thanks for the clarification! On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Dilger, Andreas wrote: > On Mar 23, 2017, at 18:38, Nathan R.M. Crawford wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > I've been evaluating some of the newer options that should be

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre-2.9 / ZFS-0.7.0 tuning recommendations

..@lists.lustre.org] On Behalf Of Dilger, Andreas Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 12:46 AM To: Nathan R.M. Crawford <nrcra...@uci.edu> Cc: lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre-2.9 / ZFS-0.7.0 tuning recommendations On Mar 23, 2017, at 18:38, Nathan R.M. Crawford &

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre-2.9 / ZFS-0.7.0 tuning recommendations

On Mar 23, 2017, at 18:38, Nathan R.M. Crawford wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've been evaluating some of the newer options that should be available > with Lustre 2.9 on top of ZFSonLinux 0.7.0 (currently at rc3). Specifically, > trying 16MB RPCS/blocks on the OSTs and large

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre-2.9 / ZFS-0.7.0 tuning recommendations

On Mar 23, 2017, at 18:38, Nathan R.M. Crawford wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've been evaluating some of the newer options that should be available with > Lustre 2.9 on top of ZFSonLinux 0.7.0 (currently at rc3). Specifically, > trying 16MB RPCS/blocks on the OSTs and large

[lustre-discuss] Lustre-2.9 / ZFS-0.7.0 tuning recommendations

Hi All, I've been evaluating some of the newer options that should be available with Lustre 2.9 on top of ZFSonLinux 0.7.0 (currently at rc3). Specifically, trying 16MB RPCS/blocks on the OSTs and large dnodes on the MDTs. I've gathered bits and pieces from discussions in the zfs and lustre