Thanks!
In the end, it was a typo.
But your explanation about parameters having wandered off to debugfs has
helped me find some other info, long lost from /proc and not
Lustre-related ;-)
Regards
Thomas
On 10/31/23 22:34, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Oct 31, 2023, at 13:12, Thomas Roth via
On Oct 31, 2023, at 13:12, Thomas Roth via lustre-discuss
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> after starting an `lctl lfsck_start -A -C -o` and the oi_scrub having
> completed, I would check the layout scan as described in the Lustre manual,
> "36.4.3.3. LFSCK status of layout via procfs", by
>
> >
Hi all,
after starting an `lctl lfsck_start -A -C -o` and the oi_scrub having completed, I would check the layout scan as described in the Lustre manual,
"36.4.3.3. LFSCK status of layout via procfs", by
> lctl get_param -n mdd.FSNAME-MDT_target.lfsck_layout
Doesn't work, and inspection of