Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.10.0 ZFS version

2017-07-18 Thread Riccardo Veraldi
you can use the dkms lustre package (build it from rpms) and get rid of kmod dependencies On 7/17/17 9:42 AM, Götz Waschk wrote: > Hi Peter, > > I wasn't able to install the official binary build of > kmod-lustre-osd-zfs, even with kmod-zfs-0.6.5.9-1.el7_3.centos from > from zfsonlinux.org, the

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.10.0 ZFS version

2017-07-17 Thread Cowe, Malcolm J
The further complication is that the Lustre kmod packages, including kmod-zfs-osd, are compiled against the “lustre-patched” kernel (3.10.0-514.21.1.el7_lustre.x86_64), rather than the unpatched OS distribution kernel that the ZoL packages are no doubt compiled against. The move to patchless

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.10.0 ZFS version

2017-07-17 Thread Dilger, Andreas
To be clear - we do not _currently_ build the Lustre RPMs against a binary RPM from ZoL, but rather build our own ZFS RPM packages, then build the Lustre RPMs against those packages. This was done because ZoL didn't provide binary RPM packages when we started using ZFS, and we are currently

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.10.0 ZFS version

2017-07-17 Thread Jones, Peter A
0.6.5.9 according to lustre/Changelog. We have tested with pre-release versions of 0.7 during the release cycle too if that’s what you’re wondering. On 7/17/17, 1:55 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Götz Waschk"

[lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.10.0 ZFS version

2017-07-17 Thread Götz Waschk
Hi everyone, which version of kmod-zfs was the official Lustre 2.10.0 binary release for CentOS 7.3 built against? Regards, Götz Waschk ___ lustre-discuss mailing list lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org