> If we do test this I'll let you know how it works.
>
Yes, please. I'm pretty curious about that.
>
> Why Lustre on GPFS? Why not just run GPFS then given it support byte
> range locking / MPI-IO and POSIX (Ignore license costs).
>
Sorry for confusion. I was just asking. I've never thought
If we do test this I'll let you know how it works.
Why Lustre on GPFS? Why not just run GPFS then given it support byte range
locking / MPI-IO and POSIX (Ignore license costs).
I'm trying to limit the number of disk systems to maintain in a system of
modest size where both MPI-IO and Object is
Has anyone ever ran Lustre OST's (and maybe MDT's) on Ceph Radios Block
Devices?
In theory this would work just like an SAN attached solution. Has anyone
ever done it before? I know we are seeing decent performance from RBD on
our system but I don't have a way to test lustre on it.
I'm
