Thank you Andreas.
Are you aware of any paid engagements/support for requests like these to
get changes done quickly?
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 at 20:52, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> This is more like a bug report and should be filed in Jira.
> That said, no guarantee that someone would be able to
> work
This is more like a bug report and should be filed in Jira.
That said, no guarantee that someone would be able to
work on this in a timely manner.
On Jan 24, 2024, at 09:47, Backer via lustre-discuss
mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org>> wrote:
Just pushing it on to the top of inbox :) Or
Just pushing it on to the top of inbox :) Or is there any other
distribution list that is more appropriate for this type of questions? I am
also trying devel mailing list.
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 at 18:34, Backer wrote:
> Just to clarify. OSS-2 is completely powered off (hard power off without
>
Just to clarify. OSS-2 is completely powered off (hard power off without
any graceful shutdown) before start working on OSS-3.
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 at 12:12, Backer wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am seeing a behavior with tunefs.lustre. After changing the failover
> node and trying to mount an OST,
Hi All,
I am seeing a behavior with tunefs.lustre. After changing the failover node
and trying to mount an OST, getting getting the following error:
The target service's index is already in use. (/dev/sdd)
After the above error, and performing --writeconf once, I can repeat these
steps (see
