Re: [lustre-discuss] Odd quota behavior with Lustre/ZFS

2017-02-16 Thread Alexander I Kulyavtsev
zfs-0.6.4.1 Alex. From: Mohr Jr, Richard Frank (Rick Mohr) <rm...@utk.edu> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 3:02 PM To: Alexander I Kulyavtsev Cc: Lustre discussion Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] Odd quota behavior with Lustre/ZFS Alex, Were you ever able t

Re: [lustre-discuss] Odd quota behavior with Lustre/ZFS

2017-02-16 Thread Mohr Jr, Richard Frank (Rick Mohr)
Alex, Were you ever able to get more details about this problem? Thanks. -- Rick Mohr Senior HPC System Administrator National Institute for Computational Sciences http://www.nics.tennessee.edu > On Feb 9, 2017, at 10:27 PM, Alexander I Kulyavtsev wrote: > > Yes, in lustre

Re: [lustre-discuss] Odd quota behavior with Lustre/ZFS

2017-02-09 Thread Alexander I Kulyavtsev
Yes, in lustre 2.5.3 after doing chgrp for large subtree. IIRC, for three groups; counts were small different "negative" numbers, not 21. I can get more details tomorrow. Alex > On Feb 9, 2017, at 5:14 PM, Mohr Jr, Richard Frank (Rick Mohr) > wrote: > > Has anyone else

[lustre-discuss] Odd quota behavior with Lustre/ZFS

2017-02-09 Thread Mohr Jr, Richard Frank (Rick Mohr)
I recently set up a Lustre 2.8 file system that uses ZFS for the backend storage (both on the MDT and OSTs). When I was doing some testing, I noticed that the output from lfs quota seemed odd. While the quota information for the amount of used space seemed correct, the info on the number of