David,
If it’s brand new DDN I’m sure you paid enough for it to be able to call
Alex on his yacht and get this issue sorted out….but I digress.
Previously in this thread it appeared that ldiskfs was disjointed over
something. To have a new clean ldiskfs format go sideways like that is
*highly*
Hi Jeff,
The logs are clear, the new OST is a brand new DDN pool, no alerts on the
physical storage, and no indications of malfunctioning disks in the
machines logs
After reboot the device dm changes:
ls -la /dev/mapper/OST0051
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 Jul 6 07:59 /dev/mapper/OST0051 -> ../dm-30
What devices are underneath dm-21 and are there any errors in
/var/log/messages for those devices? (assuming /dev/sdX devices underneath)
Run `ls /sys/block/dm-21/slaves` to see what devices are beneath dm-21
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 20:09 David Cohen
wrote:
> Hi,
> The index of the OST is
Hello
I think you have a disk problem , bad blocks which is causing the problem ,
unmount the disk and run e2fsck and repair the bad blocks as well (man
e2fsck)
Le mar. 6 juil. 2021 à 09:28, David Cohen a
écrit :
> Thanks Artem,
> I already tried that (e2fsck) with no avail.
> I even tried
Thanks Artem,
I already tried that (e2fsck) with no avail.
I even tried tunefs.lustre --writeconf --erase-params on the MDS and all
the other targets, but the behaviour remains the same.
Best regards,
David
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 10:09 AM Благодаренко Артём <
artem.blagodare...@gmail.com>
Hello David,
> On 6 Jul 2021, at 08:34, David Cohen wrote:
>
> Jul 6 07:39:19 oss03 kernel: LDISKFS-fs (dm-21): warning: mounting fs with
> errors, running e2fsck is recommended
It looks like LDISKFS partition is in inconsistent state now. It is better to
follow the recommendation and run
Thanks Andreas,
I'm aware that index 51 actually translates to hex 33 (local-OST0033_UUID).
I don't believe that's the reason for the failed mount as it is only an
index that I increase for every new OST and there are no duplicates.
lctl dk show tens of thousands of lines repeating the same error
On Jul 5, 2021, at 09:05, David Cohen
mailto:cda...@physics.technion.ac.il>> wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Lustre 2.10.5 and lately tried to add a new OST.
The OST was formatted with the command below, which other than the index is the
exact same one used for all the other OSTs in the system.
Hello
could you submit logs files please
Le lun. 5 juil. 2021 à 17:05, David Cohen a
écrit :
> Hi,
> I'm using Lustre 2.10.5 and lately tried to add a new OST.
> The OST was formatted with the command below, which other than the index
> is the exact same one used for all the other OSTs in the
Hi,
I'm using Lustre 2.10.5 and lately tried to add a new OST.
The OST was formatted with the command below, which other than the index is
the exact same one used for all the other OSTs in the system.
mkfs.lustre --reformat --mkfsoptions="-t ext4 -T huge" --ost
--fsname=local --index=0051
10 matches
Mail list logo
