First of all, thank you for the support.
The targets are LDdiskFS and below you can see some outputs.
I have no idea why these large inodes were chosen and I'm understanding
that the only option to fix it is the process of migrating and reformatting
OSTs. Sounds easy, but I've never done this
The t0 filesystem OSTs are formatted for an average file size of 70TB / 300M
inodes = 240KB/inode.
The t1 filesystem OSTs are formatted for an average file size of 500TB / 65M
inodes = 7.7MB/inode.
So not only are the t1 OSTs larger, but they have fewer inodes (by a factor of
32x). This must
Good morning, Carlos. Are those LDiskFS or ZFS targets, and what do the
non-inode `lfs df`s look like?
___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
Hello experts,
We have a Lustre with two tiers T0(SSD) and T1(HDD), the first with 70TB
and the second one with ~500TB.
I'm experiencing a problem that the T1 has much less inodes than T0 and
that is getting without inodes in the OSTs, so I'd like to understand the
source of this and how to fix
