rtial: 0
>> namespace_osts_co-failed: 0
>> namespace_osts_co-stopped: 0
>> namespace_osts_co-paused: 0
>> namespace_osts_unknown: 0
>> namespace_repaired: 4550034
>
>
>
> =
> Fernando Pérez
> Institut de Ciències del
> On Apr 17, 2019, at 4:32 AM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>
> I tried to run the e2fsck in the mdt three years ago and the logs shows a lot
> of this kind of messages:
>
>> Unattached inode 26977505
>> Connect to /lost+found? yes
>> Inode 26977505 ref count is 2, should be 1. Fix? yes
>
> In fact
f Fernando Perez
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 4:33 PM
To: lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] lfsck repair quota
Dear Martin.
I tried to run the e2fsck in the mdt three years ago and the logs shows a lot
of this kind of messages:
> Unattached inode 26977505
>
Dear Fernando,
I'm not sure if those files contribute to the quota, but I would assume
that the ones on the OSTs consume disk quota and the ones on the MDT
consume inode quota.
As long as they are in the lost+found directory they are not visible to
the users, but they may contain data which
: Re: [lustre-discuss] lfsck repair quota
Thank you Rick.
I followed these steps for the ldiskfs OSTs and MDT, but the quotes for all
users is more corrupted than before.
I tried to run e2fsck in ldiskfs OSTs MDT, but the problem was the MDT e2fsck
ran very slow ( 10 inodes per second for more
-CSIC)
Departament Oceanografía Física i Tecnològica
Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta,37-49
08003 Barcelona
Phone: (+34) 93 230 96 35
=
> El 16 abr 2019, a las 20:43, Martin Hecht escribió:
>
> Are there a lot of inodes moved to lo
On Apr 16, 2019, at 07:34, Mohr Jr, Richard Frank (Rick Mohr)
wrote:
>
>> On Apr 15, 2019, at 10:54 AM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>>
>> Could anyone confirm me that the correct way to repair wrong quotes in a
>> ldiskfs mdt is lctl lfsck_start -t layout -A?
>
> As far as I know, lfsck doesn’t
On Apr 16, 2019, at 09:22, Mohr Jr, Richard Frank (Rick Mohr)
wrote:
>
>> On Apr 16, 2019, at 10:24 AM, Fernando Pérez wrote:
>>
>> According to the lustre wiki I though that the lfsck could repair corrupted
>> quotes:
>>
>> http://wiki.lustre.org/Lustre_Quota_Troubleshooting
>
> Keep in
Are there a lot of inodes moved to lost+found by the fsck, which contribute to
the occupied quota now?
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
Von: Fernando Pérez
An: lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
Gesendet: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:24:13 +0200 (CEST)
Betreff: Re: [lustre-discuss] lfsck repair quota
Thank
Thank you Rick.
Then, does anyone know how repair corrupted quotes?
Regards.
Fernando Pérez
Institut de Ciències del Mar (CSIC)
Departament Oceanografía Física i Tecnològica
Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta,37-49
08003 Barcelona
Phone: (+34) 93
> On Apr 16, 2019, at 10:24 AM, Fernando Pérez wrote:
>
> According to the lustre wiki I though that the lfsck could repair corrupted
> quotes:
>
> http://wiki.lustre.org/Lustre_Quota_Troubleshooting
Keep in mind that page is a few years old, but I assume they were referring to
LFSCK Phase
Thank you Rick.
I followed these steps for the ldiskfs OSTs and MDT, but the quotes for all
users is more corrupted than before.
I tried to run e2fsck in ldiskfs OSTs MDT, but the problem was the MDT e2fsck
ran very slow ( 10 inodes per second for more than 100 million inodes).
According to
> On Apr 15, 2019, at 10:54 AM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>
> Could anyone confirm me that the correct way to repair wrong quotes in a
> ldiskfs mdt is lctl lfsck_start -t layout -A?
As far as I know, lfsck doesn’t repair quota info. It only fixes internal
consistency within Lustre.
Whenever I
Dear lustre users,
Could anyone confirm me that the correct way to repair wrong quotes in a
ldiskfs mdt is lctl lfsck_start -t layout -A?
Thanks in advance.
Regards.
=
Fernando Pérez
Institut de Ciències del Mar (CSIC)
Departament Oceanografía
14 matches
Mail list logo
