Re: [Lustre-discuss] [wc-discuss] lustre client on arm debian

2012-11-01 Thread Gabriele Paciucci
Hi Andreas, many vendors are going to put in the market ARM+GPU based cluster. Yes, ARM is a 32bit system, with now a 1 Gbit connection normally, but in few watt could have a performance of 300 GFlops... so I think in the near future could be a player in the HPC market. I'm interested yust for

[Lustre-discuss] lctl ping of Pacemaker IP

2012-11-01 Thread Ms. Megan Larko
Greetings! I am working with Lustre-2.1.2 on RHEL 6.2. First I configured it using the standard defaults over TCP/IP. Everything worked very nicely usnig a real, static --mgsnode=a.b.c.x value which was the actual IP of the MGS/MDS system1 node. I am now trying to integrate it with

Re: [Lustre-discuss] lctl ping of Pacemaker IP

2012-11-01 Thread Jeff Johnson
Megan, lnet pings aren't the same as tcpip/udp pings. An lnet ping 'lctl ping' would need to touch an active lnet instance on the target address. I don't think you can bind lnet to a pacemaker virtual IP but I'll let someone smarter than me on this list confirm or correct me. In any event an