Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre Sizing

2018-12-31 Thread Jeff Johnson
ANS, Lustre on top of ZFS has to estimate capacities and it’s fairly off when the OSTs are new and empty. As objects are written to OSTs and capacity is consumed it gets the sizing of capacity more accurate. At the beginning it’s so off that it appears to be an error. What version are you

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre Sizing

2018-12-31 Thread ANS
Thanks Jeff. Currently i am using modinfo zfs | grep version version:0.8.0-rc2 rhelversion:7.4 lfs --version lfs 2.12.0 And this is a fresh install. So is there any other possibility to show the complete zpool lun has been allocated for lustre alone. Thanks, ANS On Tue, Jan 1,

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre Sizing

2018-12-31 Thread Jeff Johnson
Very forward versions...especially on ZFS. You build OST volumes in a pool. If no other volumes are defined in a pool then 100% of that pool will be available for the OST volume but the way ZFS works the capacity doesn’t really belong to the OST volume until blocks are allocated for writes. So

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre Sizing

2018-12-31 Thread ANS
Thank you Jeff. I have created the lustre on ZFS freshly and no other is having access to it. So when mounted it on client it is showing around 40TB variation from the actual space. So what could be the reason for this variation of the size. Thanks, ANS On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 12:21 PM Jeff