On May 14, 2008 16:14 -0400, Garland Jackson wrote:
I have a user at the Naval Research Laboratory running Lustre on a Cray
XD1.
I'll let his email to me tell the story, but he doesn't want to know if the
numbers he's observing are reasonable.
What do you say out there? Can anyone out
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 03:16:31PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Apr 30, 2008 11:40 -0400, Aaron Knister wrote:
Some more information that might be helpful. There is a particular code
that one of our users runs. Personally after the trouble this code has
caused us we'd like to hand him a
Robin Humble 写道:
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 03:16:31PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Apr 30, 2008 11:40 -0400, Aaron Knister wrote:
Some more information that might be helpful. There is a particular code
that one of our users runs. Personally after the trouble this code has
caused
Hi,
I run 1.6.4.3-patchless againt a vanilla 2.6.18 - but with OpenVZ
patches on my clients. OpenVZ is virtualization (like vserver, bsd jails
etc.).
On a regular basis a process get stuck in __d_lookup. When I dig in it
seems I'm caught in the hlist_for_each_entry_rcu loop never satisfying
the
Hi Folks,
Having some trouble with building Lustre 1.6.4.3 with OFED 1.2.5.5 on a
RHEL 4u4 AS server. Could somebody please help me to understand where
I've gone wrong? Here's what I have done so far:
1. Install RHEL 4u4 AS (full installation).
2. Download the Lustre RPMs from sun.com:
Ah! That would make a lot of sense. echoing 0 to statahead_count
doesn't really do anything other than hang my session. Thanks!
-Aaron
On May 15, 2008, at 4:36 AM, Yong Fan wrote:
Robin Humble 写道:
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 03:16:31PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Apr 30, 2008 11:40
I think you should be more worried about your hardware. We have several
Nexsan units including dual controller Satabeasts running Raid6. A few
months ago one of them had a glitch and it incorrectly marked 3 disks
as bad within 6 seconds. So it had started the rebuild process then
stopped in
A search of bugzilla yields bug 15315 which identifies bug 15030 as
well. Please read through those two bugs.
b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
Dear All,
What is the expected date when v1.6.5 arrives?
What kernels (patchless clients) will be supported?
Thank you,
tamas
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
I concur with Andreas; this question comes around regularly, but the all
the details of the Lustre FS deployment, as well as host cluster
configuration and implementation, have inordinate significance.
You can refer to the thread Off-topic: largest existing Lustre file
system? back in January
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 18:13 +0200, Papp Tamás wrote:
Dear All,
What is the expected date when v1.6.5 arrives?
We don't try to predict release dates. I can tell you that RC3 just
went to QA.
What kernels (patchless clients) will be supported?
From the lustre/Changelog:
* Support
We build a Lustre appliance that comes fully configured and tuned. A
number of customers have asked us about small file performance. We are
looking for feedback on how people quantify this type of performance
with their Lustre based systems. In most cases we are looking at
applications that are
On May 15, 2008 18:13 +0200, Papp Tam�s wrote:
What is the expected date when v1.6.5 arrives?
The 1.6.5 release is undergoing internal testing, and we hope to release
it in the next couple of weeks, but this is subject to successful testing
(or there is no point in doing the testing...). You
13 matches
Mail list logo
