Re: [Lustre-discuss] lfs quota limit problem

2008-07-30 Thread Andrew Perepechko
Hi User and group quotas are separate. When either of the limits is reached, a process with corresponding effective uid/gid is not allowed to allocate any more space on a filesystem. Andrew. On Tuesday 29 July 2008 18:44:56 David Levi Hevroni wrote: Hi, We had some problem with lfs quota

Re: [Lustre-discuss] LustreError: acquire timeout exceeded

2008-07-30 Thread Andreas Dilger
On Jul 29, 2008 18:51 +0200, Thomas Roth wrote: kern.log.1:Jul 20 06:47:19 kernel: LustreError: 27696:0:(upcall_cache.c:326:upcall_cache_get_entry()) acquire timeout exceeded for key 0 kern.log.1:Jul 20 06:47:41 kernel: LustreError: 27713:0:(upcall_cache.c:326:upcall_cache_get_entry())

Re: [Lustre-discuss] collectl

2008-07-30 Thread Mark Seger
Andreas Dilger wrote: On Jul 29, 2008 18:43 -0400, Mark Seger wrote: your definition are perfect and I'll add them to my documentation. With respect to my comment about chmod on 100 files only incrementing the counter once, it did it 100 times this time when I tired it, so never

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Works: Re: mkfs.lustre (can't allocate memory)

2008-07-30 Thread Andreas Dilger
On Jul 30, 2008 02:37 -0400, Josephine Palencia wrote: This work-around worked. Thank you very much. Can you please file a bug with the details. A better solution is to replace / in s_id with _ when creating the proc file so that the full pathname is available. Alternately, this could create

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre IOkit newbie: sgpdd-survey

2008-07-30 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 15:38 -0400, Ms. Megan Larko wrote: Hello, Hi, Lustre-IOkit sgpdd-survey: scsidevs=/dev/sg16 Per your followup message, you specify the block devices you want to test, not their SG mapped device. sgpdd_survey will figure out what devices they are mapped to

Re: [Lustre-discuss] MGS failover

2008-07-30 Thread Brock Palen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thank you, I was only looking at the mkfs.lustre didn't think the hosts are the ones that need to look there, not mgs filesystem its self. does the mgsspec also work for --mgsnode= when creating a file system? mkfs.lustre [EMAIL

Re: [Lustre-discuss] collectl

2008-07-30 Thread Kilian CAVALOTTI
Hi Mark, useful. I suppose one might also make that argument about things like statfs, getattr - the only time I was able to make them change was in response to lfs commands. Might that logic also be applied to extended attributes and acl counters which I suspect also fall into the category

Re: [Lustre-discuss] collectl

2008-07-30 Thread Mark Seger
I just did an interesting experiment. If I run the command 'lfs df' in a tight loop, the reint_statfs counters increments once but if I stick in a sleep 1, it increments it for every call. is this a bug or a feature? Is it doing some kind of short-lived cache lookup in the first can but not

Re: [Lustre-discuss] collectl

2008-07-30 Thread Andreas Dilger
On Jul 30, 2008 14:52 -0400, Mark Seger wrote: I just did an interesting experiment. If I run the command 'lfs df' in a tight loop, the reint_statfs counters increments once but if I stick in a sleep 1, it increments it for every call. is this a bug or a feature? Is it doing some

Re: [Lustre-discuss] collectl

2008-07-30 Thread Mark Seger
Kilian CAVALOTTI wrote: Hi Mark, useful. I suppose one might also make that argument about things like statfs, getattr - the only time I was able to make them change was in response to lfs commands. Might that logic also be applied to extended attributes and acl counters which I

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Early replies from pre-1.6.5 servers?

2008-07-30 Thread Brian Behlendorf
Daniel, Daniel Kobras wrote: Hi! While debugging connection problems on a Lustre client running 1.6.5.1 on RHEL5, I discovered early replies in the client debug output. Adaptive timeouts are disabled on the client, and our server infrastructure in running stock 1.6.4.3 (RHEL5),

Re: [Lustre-discuss] collectl

2008-07-30 Thread Andreas Dilger
On Jul 30, 2008 18:15 -0400, Mark Seger wrote: so here's the test I did. I created 200 files and set acls on all of them. setxattr changed by 200. then I did an ls -l on the directory with the files in it and getxattr changed by 1. when I removed all the files reint changed by 200.