Re: [Lustre-discuss] [wc-discuss] lustre client on arm debian

2012-11-01 Thread Gabriele Paciucci
Hi Andreas,
many vendors are going to put in the market ARM+GPU based cluster. Yes, 
ARM is a 32bit system, with now a 1 Gbit connection normally, but in few 
watt could have a performance of 300 GFlops... so I think in the near 
future could be a player in the HPC market.

I'm interested yust for the patchless cluster...

thanks

On 10/31/2012 04:55 PM, Dilger, Andreas wrote:
 On 2012-10-31, at 8:27, Gabriele Paciucci paciu...@gmail.com wrote:
 has anyone tried to compile the lustre patchless client on a debian linux 
 for arm architecture? Could be possible to do?
 Gabriel,
 Many years ago, someone was working on a MIPS port for Lustre and I believe 
 they got it working, but I don't think the patches ever landed. You could 
 make a quick search in bugzilla to see what changes they made, and update 
 this for Arm as well.

 Are you looking for client or server support?  My understanding is that Arm 
 is only 32-bit today.  While we regularly build for 32-bit kernels, this is 
 not tested automatically on master anymore so it is possible that there have 
 been regressions in this area.

 If be happy to hear your experiences in this area, and it would be a good 
 time to land any patches needed to make Arm builds working.

 Cheers, Andreas

___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss


[Lustre-discuss] lctl ping of Pacemaker IP

2012-11-01 Thread Ms. Megan Larko
Greetings!

I am working with Lustre-2.1.2 on RHEL 6.2.  First I configured it
using the standard defaults over TCP/IP.   Everything worked very
nicely usnig a real, static --mgsnode=a.b.c.x value which was the
actual IP of the MGS/MDS system1 node.

I am now trying to integrate it with Pacemaker-1.1.7.I believe I
have most of the set-up completed with a particular exception.  The
lctl ping command cannot ping the pacemaker IP alias (say a.b.c.d).
The generic ping command in RHEL 6.2 can successfully access the
interface.  The Pacemaker alias IP (for failover of the combnied
MGSMDS node with Fibre Channel multipath storage shared between both
MGS/MDS-configured machines)  works in and of itself.  I tested with
an apache service.   The Pacemaker will correctly fail over the
MGS/MDS from system1 to system2 properly.  If I go to system2 then my
Lustre file system stops because it cannot get to the alias IP number.

I did configure the lustre OSTs to use --mgsnode=a.b.c.d (a.b.c.d
representing my Pacemaker IP alias).  A tunefs.lustre confirms the
alias IP number.  The alias IP number does not appear in LNET (lctl
list_nids), and lctl ping a.b.c.d fails.

Should this IP alias go into the LNET data base?  If yes, how?   What
steps should I take to generate a successful lctl ping a.b.c.d?

Thanks for reading!
Cheers,
megan
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss


Re: [Lustre-discuss] lctl ping of Pacemaker IP

2012-11-01 Thread Jeff Johnson
Megan,

lnet pings aren't the same as tcpip/udp pings. An lnet ping 'lctl ping' would 
need to touch an active lnet instance on the target address. I don't think you 
can bind lnet to a pacemaker virtual IP but I'll let someone smarter than me on 
this list confirm or correct me.

In any event an lnet ping and udp ping are completely separate animals.

--Jeff

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 1, 2012, at 21:04, Ms. Megan Larko dobsonu...@gmail.com wrote:

 Greetings!
 
 I am working with Lustre-2.1.2 on RHEL 6.2.  First I configured it
 using the standard defaults over TCP/IP.   Everything worked very
 nicely usnig a real, static --mgsnode=a.b.c.x value which was the
 actual IP of the MGS/MDS system1 node.
 
 I am now trying to integrate it with Pacemaker-1.1.7.I believe I
 have most of the set-up completed with a particular exception.  The
 lctl ping command cannot ping the pacemaker IP alias (say a.b.c.d).
 The generic ping command in RHEL 6.2 can successfully access the
 interface.  The Pacemaker alias IP (for failover of the combnied
 MGSMDS node with Fibre Channel multipath storage shared between both
 MGS/MDS-configured machines)  works in and of itself.  I tested with
 an apache service.   The Pacemaker will correctly fail over the
 MGS/MDS from system1 to system2 properly.  If I go to system2 then my
 Lustre file system stops because it cannot get to the alias IP number.
 
 I did configure the lustre OSTs to use --mgsnode=a.b.c.d (a.b.c.d
 representing my Pacemaker IP alias).  A tunefs.lustre confirms the
 alias IP number.  The alias IP number does not appear in LNET (lctl
 list_nids), and lctl ping a.b.c.d fails.
 
 Should this IP alias go into the LNET data base?  If yes, how?   What
 steps should I take to generate a successful lctl ping a.b.c.d?
 
 Thanks for reading!
 Cheers,
 megan
 ___
 Lustre-discuss mailing list
 Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
 http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss