Re: [lustre-discuss] can not get the hsm_release command to work with Lustre 2.7 and Oracle HSM 6.1

Colin, The first file was a data file so; I made another file that was a txt file named test. Archived it then changed the file and here is the output below. The copytool daemon are different this time and are complaining about (cannot get path of FID and cannot set attributes)    

[lustre-discuss] ZFS backed OSS out of memory

Folks, I've done my fair share of googling and run across some good information on ZFS backed Lustre tuning including this: http://lustre.ornl.gov/ecosystem-2016/documents/tutorials/Stearman-LLNL-ZFS.pdf and various discussions around how to limit (or not) the ARC and clear it if needed.

Re: [lustre-discuss] can not get the hsm_release command to work with Lustre 2.7 and Oracle HSM 6.1

Colin here is the output from the POSIX copytool daemon. It looks like it was successful shown below. The file is out on the HSM SAMQFS file system.   1466633273.355200 lhsmtool_posix[16036]: archiving 'mnt/.lustre/fid/0x20400:0x7:0x0' to

Re: [lustre-discuss] can not get the hsm_release command to work with Lustre 2.7 and Oracle HSM 6.1

Hi Michael, Does the backend copytool actually archive the file and notify lustre of the action? Based on your current state it only appears that the archive request was made and that it has not yet successfully archived. In such a case release would be disallowed as it would amount to a data

Re: [lustre-discuss] Trying to compile lustre 2.8 against kernel 4.5

In the end I used kernel 4.2.x since we don't have time or expertise to permit us to take the risk of editing the lustre source. I believe HEAD is actually compatible with newer kernels since someone else on the list recently reported installing it on Ubuntu 16.04 which is kernel 4.4.x Only one

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre Client Package for Rocks 6.2

Yes Thanks & Regards Yasir Israr > On 23-Jun-2016, at 4:57 PM, E.S. Rosenberg wrote: > > Have you tried doing the lustre install from source? > >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:45 AM, wrote: >> Dear Rocks User, >> >> >> >> Please help

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre Client Package for Rocks 6.2

Have you tried doing the lustre install from source? On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:45 AM, wrote: > *Dear Rocks User,* > > > > Please help in getting correct Lustre Client Package for Rocks 6.2 with > Kernel 2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.x86_64 > > Currently I’m trying to install

[lustre-discuss] Lustre Client Package for Rocks 6.2

Dear Rocks User, Please help in getting correct Lustre Client Package for Rocks 6.2 with Kernel 2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.x86_64 Currently I'm trying to install Client Package of Lustre 2.7 & 2.8 but it's not working & asking to downgrade existing kernel. I couldn't able to downgrade because we