Re: [lustre-discuss] Do I need Lustre?

On Apr 30, 2018, at 07:11, Thackeray, Neil L wrote: > > Sorry, I left out file size. We don't foresee growing tremendously. The plan > is for researchers to upload their data, get the results, and copy it down to > a mounted file system. This is going to be used by multiple

Re: [lustre-discuss] rhel 7.5

On Apr 30, 2018, at 11:49, Michael Di Domenico wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Jeff Johnson > wrote: >> RHEL 7.5 support comes in Lustre 2.10.4. Only path I can think of off the >> top of my head is to git clone and build a

Re: [lustre-discuss] rhel 7.5

On 04/30/2018 11:49 AM, Michael Di Domenico wrote: On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote: RHEL 7.5 support comes in Lustre 2.10.4. Only path I can think of off the top of my head is to git clone and build a 2.10.4 prerelease and live on the

Re: [lustre-discuss] rhel 7.5

The ChangeLog in 2.11.59 doesn’t mention a 7.5 server kernel. You can reference lustre/ChangeLog in the various tags in the Lustre git repo. The official support matrix is here: https://wiki.hpdd.intel.com/plugins/servlet/mobile?contentId=8126580#content/view/8126580 —Jeff On Mon, Apr 30, 2018

Re: [lustre-discuss] Do I need Lustre?

The type of storage you decide on should be a factor of the workloads that you plan on executing against, as well as the back-end storage systems. Having all SSD based file systems can be useful in the case of small / random IO however in many cases the controllers will not be able to take

Re: [lustre-discuss] rhel 7.5

I have 2.11 already running on a 7.5 clone (client only) -Original Message- From: lustre-discuss [mailto:lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org] On Behalf Of Michael Di Domenico Sent: Monday, April 30, 2018 11:49 AM Cc: lustre-discuss Subject: Re:

Re: [lustre-discuss] rhel 7.5

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote: > RHEL 7.5 support comes in Lustre 2.10.4. Only path I can think of off the > top of my head is to git clone and build a 2.10.4 prerelease and live on the > bleeding edge. I’m not sure if all of the 7.5 work is

Re: [lustre-discuss] rhel 7.5

RHEL 7.5 support comes in Lustre 2.10.4. Only path I can think of off the top of my head is to git clone and build a 2.10.4 prerelease and live on the bleeding edge. I’m not sure if all of the 7.5 work is finished in the current prerelease or not. —Jeff On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 06:21 Michael Di

Re: [lustre-discuss] rhel 7.5

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 9:19 AM, Michael Di Domenico wrote: > when i tried to compile 2.10.2 patchless client into rpms under rhel > 7.5 using kernel 3.10.0-862.el7.x86_64 > > the compilation went fine as far as i can tell and the rpm creation > seemed to work > > but when

[lustre-discuss] rhel 7.5

when i tried to compile 2.10.2 patchless client into rpms under rhel 7.5 using kernel 3.10.0-862.el7.x86_64 the compilation went fine as far as i can tell and the rpm creation seemed to work but when i went install the rpms i got Error: Package: kmod-lustre-client-2.10.2-1.el7.x86_64

Re: [lustre-discuss] Do I need Lustre?

Sorry, I left out file size. We don't foresee growing tremendously. The plan is for researchers to upload their data, get the results, and copy it down to a mounted file system. This is going to be used by multiple researchers, and we will be charging for compute time. We really don't want this