Re: [Lustre-discuss] Gluster then DRBD now Lustre?

2008-06-24 Thread Andreas Dilger
On Jun 17, 2008 10:40 -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote: If you have a dedicated gigabit link (no congestion), InfiniBand might work pretty well. I've used the Obsidian Longbow IB WAN extenders, and got better performance using IB than over TCP. I believe there is also a version that does AES

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Gluster then DRBD now Lustre?

2008-06-17 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 08:51 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So any node does you lose the data? I will parse that as so if you lose any node, you lose data? and the answer to that is yes. If you lose an OST, you lose data. If you lose the MDT you lose the entire filesystem. Lustre assumes

[Lustre-discuss] Gluster then DRBD now Lustre?

2008-06-16 Thread nathan
I have been spending a lot of time with Gluster, I like it a lot, on the surface it looks great. I like that I can get RAID 6 like functionality out of it, however after testing found it is not just ready for prime time. Our day one config is two servers with 10TB each in NYC and SJC.

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Gluster then DRBD now Lustre?

2008-06-16 Thread Cliff White
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Kilian CAVALOTTI wrote: On Monday 16 June 2008 11:40:40 am Andreas Dilger wrote: NYC == New York City? What is SJC? SJC == San Jose, California That's why I thought, but if so, the following part loses me: This is working in a test setup,