[Lustre-discuss] Lustre 1.8.4 - Local mount of ost for backup purposes, fs type ldiskfs or ext4?

2011-05-11 Thread Jeff Johnson
Greetings,

I am doing a local mount of a 8TB ost device in a Lustre 1.8.4 
installation. The ost was built with a backfstype of ldiskfs.

When attempting the local mount:

 mount -t ldiskfs /dev/sdc /mnt/save/ost

I get:

 mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdt,
 missing codepage or other error

I am able to mount the same block device as ext4, just not as ldiskfs. I 
need to be able to mount as ldiskfs to get access to the extended 
attributes and back them up. Is this still the case with the ext4 
extensions for Lustre 1.8.4? I am able to mount read-only as ext4 but 
any attempt at reading the extended attributes with getfattr fails.

Thanks,

--Jeff

-- 
--
Jeff Johnson
Manager
Aeon Computing

jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com
www.aeoncomputing.com
t: 858-412-3810 x101   f: 858-412-3845
m: 619-204-9061

4905 Morena Boulevard, Suite 1313 - San Diego, CA 92117

___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss


Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre 1.8.4 - Local mount of ost for backup purposes, fs type ldiskfs or ext4?

2011-05-11 Thread Cory Spitz
Hi.

You didn't say what your kernel version was.  Check dmesg, you'll likely
get a better reason for the failure there.  It's possible that the
force_over_8tb option is needed and not passed along appropriately.
Check out Lustre bugzilla 24432 and attachment 32731 which honors the
force_over_8tb mount option.  It'll be included in 1.8.6.

-Cory


On 05/11/2011 05:23 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
 Greetings,
 
 I am doing a local mount of a 8TB ost device in a Lustre 1.8.4 
 installation. The ost was built with a backfstype of ldiskfs.
 
 When attempting the local mount:
 
  mount -t ldiskfs /dev/sdc /mnt/save/ost
 
 I get:
 
  mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdt,
  missing codepage or other error
 
 I am able to mount the same block device as ext4, just not as ldiskfs. I 
 need to be able to mount as ldiskfs to get access to the extended 
 attributes and back them up. Is this still the case with the ext4 
 extensions for Lustre 1.8.4? I am able to mount read-only as ext4 but 
 any attempt at reading the extended attributes with getfattr fails.
 
 Thanks,
 
 --Jeff
 
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss


Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre 1.8.4 - Local mount of ost for backup purposes, fs type ldiskfs or ext4?

2011-05-11 Thread Kevin Van Maren
Well, that's the opposite problem of Bug 24398.

Are you sure you are using the ext4-based ldiskfs?

Kevin


On May 11, 2011, at 4:23 PM, Jeff Johnson jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com 
  wrote:

 Greetings,

 I am doing a local mount of a 8TB ost device in a Lustre 1.8.4
 installation. The ost was built with a backfstype of ldiskfs.

 When attempting the local mount:

mount -t ldiskfs /dev/sdc /mnt/save/ost

 I get:

mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdt,
missing codepage or other error

 I am able to mount the same block device as ext4, just not as  
 ldiskfs. I
 need to be able to mount as ldiskfs to get access to the extended
 attributes and back them up. Is this still the case with the ext4
 extensions for Lustre 1.8.4? I am able to mount read-only as ext4 but
 any attempt at reading the extended attributes with getfattr fails.

 Thanks,

 --Jeff

 -- 
 --
 Jeff Johnson
 Manager
 Aeon Computing

 jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com
 www.aeoncomputing.com
 t: 858-412-3810 x101   f: 858-412-3845
 m: 619-204-9061

 4905 Morena Boulevard, Suite 1313 - San Diego, CA 92117

 ___
 Lustre-discuss mailing list
 Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
 http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss