Re: [lustre-discuss] ZFS tunings

2019-07-16 Thread Degremont, Aurelien
Nobody on this topic?
I'm pretty sure they are lots of people running Lustre on ZFS with various 
tuning applied. Don't be shy 


De : "Degremont, Aurelien" 
Date : mercredi 10 juillet 2019 à 10:35
À : "lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org" 
Objet : ZFS tunings

Hi all,

I know good default tunings for ZFS when used with Lustre is a big topic. There 
are several pages on wiki or LUG/LAD slides which are few years old and it is 
difficult to know which ones are still relevant when used with recent Lustre 
and ZFS versions.

Does anybody have insight about which tunings are important. Especially for:

  *   zfs atime (does DMU when used by Lustre also updates atime ?)
  *   redundant_metadata=most
  *   metaslab_debug_unload=1
  *   zfs_prefetch_disable=1
  *   zfs_vdev_scheduler=deadline

Lustre already sets ‘xattr=sa’, ‘dnodesize=auto’ and ‘recordsize=1M’ 
automatically since Lustre 2.11.

Thanks

Aurélien


___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org


[lustre-discuss] ZFS tunings

2019-07-10 Thread Degremont, Aurelien
Hi all,

I know good default tunings for ZFS when used with Lustre is a big topic. There 
are several pages on wiki or LUG/LAD slides which are few years old and it is 
difficult to know which ones are still relevant when used with recent Lustre 
and ZFS versions.

Does anybody have insight about which tunings are important. Especially for:

  *   zfs atime (does DMU when used by Lustre also updates atime ?)
  *   redundant_metadata=most
  *   metaslab_debug_unload=1
  *   zfs_prefetch_disable=1
  *   zfs_vdev_scheduler=deadline

Lustre already sets ‘xattr=sa’, ‘dnodesize=auto’ and ‘recordsize=1M’ 
automatically since Lustre 2.11.

Thanks

Aurélien


___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org