[lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.10.0 ZFS version

2017-07-17 Thread Götz Waschk
Hi everyone, which version of kmod-zfs was the official Lustre 2.10.0 binary release for CentOS 7.3 built against? Regards, Götz Waschk ___ lustre-discuss mailing list lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-l

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.10.0 ZFS version

2017-07-17 Thread Jones, Peter A
0.6.5.9 according to lustre/Changelog. We have tested with pre-release versions of 0.7 during the release cycle too if that’s what you’re wondering. On 7/17/17, 1:55 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Götz Waschk" wrote: >Hi everyone, > >which version of kmod-zfs was the official Lustre 2.10

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.10.0 ZFS version

2017-07-17 Thread Götz Waschk
Hi Peter, I wasn't able to install the official binary build of kmod-lustre-osd-zfs, even with kmod-zfs-0.6.5.9-1.el7_3.centos from from zfsonlinux.org, the ksym deps do not match. For me, it is always rebuilding the lustre source rpm against the zfs kmod packages. Regards, Götz Waschk On Mon, J

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.10.0 ZFS version

2017-07-17 Thread Jones, Peter A
I suggest opening a JIRA ticket and someone can look into this On 7/17/17, 9:42 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Götz Waschk" wrote: >Hi Peter, > >I wasn't able to install the official binary build of >kmod-lustre-osd-zfs, even with kmod-zfs-0.6.5.9-1.el7_3.centos from >from zfsonlinux.org,

Re: [lustre-discuss] set OSTs read only ?

2017-07-17 Thread Bob Ball
Thanks for all this, Andreas. Always appreciated. bob On 7/17/2017 12:00 AM, Dilger, Andreas wrote: When you write "MGS", you really mean "MDS". The MGS would be the place for this if you were changing the config to permanently deactivate the OSTs via "lctl conf_param". To temporarily do this

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.10.0 ZFS version

2017-07-17 Thread Dilger, Andreas
To be clear - we do not _currently_ build the Lustre RPMs against a binary RPM from ZoL, but rather build our own ZFS RPM packages, then build the Lustre RPMs against those packages. This was done because ZoL didn't provide binary RPM packages when we started using ZFS, and we are currently not

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.10.0 ZFS version

2017-07-17 Thread Cowe, Malcolm J
The further complication is that the Lustre kmod packages, including kmod-zfs-osd, are compiled against the “lustre-patched” kernel (3.10.0-514.21.1.el7_lustre.x86_64), rather than the unpatched OS distribution kernel that the ZoL packages are no doubt compiled against. The move to patchless ke

[lustre-discuss] FID used by two objects

2017-07-17 Thread wanglu
Hello, One OST of our system can not be mounted in lustre mode after an severe disk error and an 5 days' e2fsck. Here are errors we got during the mount operation. #grep FID /var/log/messages Jul 17 20:15:21 oss04 kernel: LustreError: 13089:0:(osd_oi.c:653:osd_oi_insert()) lustre-OST0036: the