We recently updated to Lustre 2.8 on our cluster, and have started seeing
some unusal load issues.
Last night our MDS load climbed to well over 100, and client performance
dropped to almost zero.
Initially this appeared to be related to a number of jobs that were doing
large numbers of
Hello Lustre community!
These are the last days to send abstracts for LAD'17, do not wait! We
will be pleased to hear about your Lustre experiences. Not only
developers but also from sites or admins presenting their Lustre
deployment and experiences with it.
Hi Kevin,
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 08:18:04AM -0400, Kevin M. Hildebrand wrote:
>We recently updated to Lustre 2.8 on our cluster, and have started seeing
>some unusal load issues.
>Last night our MDS load climbed to well over 100, and client performance
>dropped to almost zero.
>Initially this
Jeff (and Grigory - offlist),
Thanks for your fast replies!
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Jeff Johnson <
jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com> wrote:
> Eli,
>
> The biggest driver is usually the drivers. Newer Mellanox hardware not yet
> supported, or supported well, by kernel IB. Way back in the
Hi all,
How 'needed' is OFED for Lustre? In the LUG talks it is mentioned every
once in a while and that got me thinking a bit.
What things are gained by installing OFED? Performance? Accurate traffic
reports?
Currently I am using a lustre system without OFED but our IB hardware is
from the FDR
Eli,
The biggest driver is usually the drivers. Newer Mellanox hardware not yet
supported, or supported well, by kernel IB. Way back in the days of old
there were some interoperability issues where everything (clients and
servers) needed to be the same drivers and libraries but much of that was
Hi Eli,
we are running lustre without OFED on debian client and server.
With lustre 2.4.0 on client and servers no problem at all since years.
With lustre 2.5.3 on servers and 2.6. 92 no problems at least for monthes.
with lustre 2.5.3 on servers and 2.7 on clients allways ib connection loss.
