David Rastall at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Are you sure it's not Jan Ackerman your'e thinking of ?
No, Ian Anderson. My four-year-old has latched onto Songs From the Wood in
that never-get-tired-of-it way that little kids have, so I know whereof I
speak.
On Friday, April 2, 2004, at 12:37 AM, Howard Posner wrote:
> I haven't followed this thread much, but isn't Anderson disqualified
> because
> he wrote for lute?
>
Are you sure it's not Jan Ackerman your'e thinking of ?
David Rastall
James A Stimson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 6. Ian Anderson
I haven't followed this thread much, but isn't Anderson disqualified because
he wrote for lute?
Dear All: Just for fun, here are my "moderns":
1. Frank Zappa
2. Miles Davis
3. John Coltrane
4. John McLaughlin
5. Louis Armstrong
6. Ian Anderson
Yours,
Jim
Dear e-friends,
As April 1st is coming to a close, and it is time to set aside the
merrymaking: I would like to offer you Lied #100, a VERY FINE anonymous
Ukrainian "Kant" about Adam's Fall from the early 1700's. It has all the
hallmarks of Dimitry Tuptalo style, so I believe it came from his pen.
The Slant Fin GF350 is quiet, effective, and safer than many. For
information about it check the buyers' guide at www.compactappliance.com.
Bobbie W.
Difficult task. Eclectic, perhaps, but these are among my favorites
... this month.
Verdi
Brahms
Tchaikovsky
Berg
Bartok
Stravinski
Runners-up:
Rachmaninoff
Messiaen
Nino Rota
Roger Sessions
Milton Babbitt
Aaron Copeland
Thelonius Monk
Frank Zappa
Mike
- Original Message -
From:
This is something I actually concocted a few years ago... Better than numerical
scorekeeping, a single elimination tournament of
composers. Best viewed with a fixed-width font and no word wrap.
Gregory I
Witold Lutoslawski:
>[hello, how, I'm]~~~
>[dear, are, fine]~~~
>[mom, you, love]
>Witold
Helmut Lachenmann:
>hschhfst..st..st..st..kh
>hhHelmut:)
Arvo Pärt:
>"Deaaar mma and paaa
>> Hildegard was a butcher?
> She has blood up to her elbows in Speer, Worms, Mainz and a few other
> places.
> So, to paraphrase Luther, whoever listens to Hildegard- hears Satan.
what happend? I don't know this story ...
>>> 1096 was the year. Hildegard is a precursor to a ce
>> I meant someone called Schicklgruber.
>> Hildegard is a precursor to a certain Austrian gentleman
>> with peculiar facial hair...
>
> Why really RT is such a spoilsport? There was a funny, entertaining
> and polite question and "poll" of the favorite composers,
I have nothing against the p
Dear Roman,
on Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Roman Turovsky answered:
> > Roman, could also you give your list of composers? Just for fun,
> > just for fun. Forget for a while to pretend an "urban intellectuel! ;)
> Arto, music is very serious matter to me, and it leaves no room for polite
> pretending of/to
> --- Roman Turovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hildegard was a butcher?
She has blood up to her elbows in Speer, Worms, Mainz and a few other
places.
So, to paraphrase Luther, whoever listens to Hildegard- hears Satan.
>>> what happend? I don't know this story ...
>> 1096 was
--- Roman Turovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Hildegard was a butcher?
> >> She has blood up to her elbows in Speer, Worms, Mainz and a few other
> >> places.
> >> So, to paraphrase Luther, whoever listens to Hildegard- hears Satan.
> > what happend? I don't know this story ...
> 1096 was th
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Roman Turovsky wrote:
> I meant someone called Schicklgruber.
> Hildegard is a precursor to a certain Austrian gentleman
> with peculiar facial hair...
Why really RT is such a spoilsport? There was a funny, entertaining
and polite question and "poll" of the favorite com
Tim Mills wrote:
>Herb,
>
>There is a little Kenmore (Sears), that I've liked a lot. Its called
>Whisper Flow/Ultrasonic model 14125. It wasn't the cheapest one, but it is
>very compact and has a built in humidity gauge and the ability to select the
>desired level. The one thing is that it puts
> Ah..I see the misunderstanding.
>
> So when Bach specified lute in the St. John Passion, he meant...
A number of possibilities.
>
> ...and I guess we should say solo lute when that's what we mean.
>
> ..and bach's 'cell suites weren't written for guitar? Turns out that at
> least one of them
Ah..I see the misunderstanding.
So when Bach specified lute in the St. John Passion, he meant...
...and I guess we should say solo lute when that's what we mean.
..and bach's 'cell suites weren't written for guitar? Turns out that at
least one of them wasn't written for 'cello either.
J
> Really Roman! There was no need to drag Johann Strauss into this discussion
>> :)
I meant someone called Schicklgruber.
RT
> But seriously, can you elaborate? Or provide a link? Pretty please?
> Garry
> Hildegard was a butcher?
She has blood up to her elbows in Speer, Worms, Mainz a
Herb,
There is a little Kenmore (Sears), that I've liked a lot. Its called
Whisper Flow/Ultrasonic model 14125. It wasn't the cheapest one, but it is
very compact and has a built in humidity gauge and the ability to select the
desired level. The one thing is that it puts out a pretty strong vol
Really Roman! There was no need to drag Johann Strauss into this discussion
>:)
But seriously, can you elaborate? Or provide a link? Pretty please?
Garry
> -Original Message-
> From: Roman Turovsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 4:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
>>> Hildegard was a butcher?
>> She has blood up to her elbows in Speer, Worms, Mainz and a few other
>> places.
>> So, to paraphrase Luther, whoever listens to Hildegard- hears Satan.
> what happend? I don't know this story ...
1096 was the year. Hildegard is a precursor to a certain Austrian gent
Am Don, 2004-04-01 um 23.17 schrieb Roman Turovsky:
> > Hildegard was a butcher?
> She has blood up to her elbows in Speer, Worms, Mainz and a few other
> places.
> So, to paraphrase Luther, whoever listens to Hildegard- hears Satan.
>
what happend? I don't know this story ...
> > I rather enj
> Hildegard was a butcher?
She has blood up to her elbows in Speer, Worms, Mainz and a few other
places.
So, to paraphrase Luther, whoever listens to Hildegard- hears Satan.
> I rather enjoy her being listed as "post-renaissance" composer. A
> certain way of truth shines through ...
> Thomas
There
Bach's lute works are debatable - we don't really know
if he actually intended them to be lute or keyboard
pieces. (It might be a little known fact to most
guitarists, but the cello suites were NOT originally
written for the modern classical guitar :-)) This
being said, I'm not against lutenists
I'm kinda partial to:
1. Beethoven
2. Sibelius
3. Regondi
4. Monteverdi
5. Calace (sometimes; some of his stuff is unbearably cheesy)
6. Mertz
I have no heady justification for this. These folks have just produced
things I like to hear.
Eugene
I am having a bit of trouble with the "non-lute" part of the poll. Does this
mean, "didn't compose for the lute?"
If so, then why are Bach, Purcell, and Montiverdi on the list? One may
as well include Dowland.
Cheers,
Joseph mayes
> From: James A Stimson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu,
--- Herbert Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Don't quite understand the Ravel thing,
>
> Though not as lucidly weighty as Monsieurs Bach and
> Beethoven, or as
> uncompromisingly elegant as Mozart, Ravel combined
> an innovative modern
> sound with rich musicality, a feat unmatched, indeed
--- Herbert Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Don't quite understand the Ravel thing,
>
> Though not as lucidly weighty as Monsieurs Bach and
> Beethoven, or as
> uncompromisingly elegant as Mozart, Ravel combined
> an innovative modern
> sound with rich musicality, a feat unmatched, indeed
an extremely low-tech air conditioner and humidifier consists of a damp
cotton sheet draped over a door or window to catch the breeze.
or...
a battery powered plant spray with timer for $22.something at:
http://www.comforthouse.com/plantsitter10.html
- bill
On Giovedì, apr 1, 2004, at 18:40
Herbert Ward wrote:
>>Don't quite understand the Ravel thing,
>>
>>
>
>Though not as lucidly weighty as Monsieurs Bach and Beethoven, or as
>uncompromisingly elegant as Mozart, Ravel combined an innovative modern
>sound with rich musicality, a feat unmatched, indeed unapproached, in my
>listen
A wet rag will not only not heat the room, it will cool the room by
sucking up the heat of evaporation, the latent heat of the liquid vapor
transition. This what keeps water in, e,g., leather bags cold in a dry
environment.
PS I'm a theorist and will leave the engineering details to you.
On Thu,
> Don't quite understand the Ravel thing,
Though not as lucidly weighty as Monsieurs Bach and Beethoven, or as
uncompromisingly elegant as Mozart, Ravel combined an innovative modern
sound with rich musicality, a feat unmatched, indeed unapproached, in my
listening experience.
Humidification in winter is easy, just boil water.
But in summer boiling water is not good.
Can anyone recommnd a non-heating room humidifier? I need
quiet
reliable
small
Yo List!
I think I've seen better prices; scroll past the msg of the day.
Regards,
Peter.
--
the next auto-quote is:
We have one party -- we have the party of essentially corporate America.
It has two right wings, one called Democratic, one called Republican.
(Gore Vidal)
/\/\
Peter Nightingale
Dear Herb: Don't quite understand the Ravel thing, but why not? I'll keep
mine to five:
1. Bach
2. Beethoven
3. Mozart
4. Monteverdi
5. D. Scarlatti
Yours,
Jim
Using a computer program, I assign
1 pointfirst place
5/6 pointsecond place
4/6 pointthird place
etc
and add everything up.
So far, Bach, Beethoven, and Mozart are leading, in testimony to the
power, grace, and vision of these men's musicality
My six are:
The three Bs
1. Bach
2. Beethoven
3. Britten
and
4. Messiaen
5. Takemitsu
6. Shostakovich
If the list were a little longer I would add Varese, Cowell, and Alan
Hovhaness.
Mark Farley
-Original Message-
From: Herbert Ward
Which non-lute post-Renaissance com
Access to the Folger Library is limited to those with a Ph.D. or
equivalent degree, or graduate students writing a Ph.D. thesis. These
persons may apply for a reader's card by writing a letter of
application and sending two letters of reference to Richard Kuhta,
Librarian, The Folger Shakespeare Li
my list goes:
1 Brahms
2 Bach
3 Correli
4 Barrios
5 Schubert
6 Beethoven
Walter
--
*** please note my new email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Dr. Walter Durka
UFZ - Umweltforschungszentrum Leipzig-Halle GmbH
Department Biozoenoseforschung
Theodor-Lieser-Straße 4
06120 Halle (Saale)
Tel: (03
Dear Daniel,
It is always wise, some might say courteous, to contact the library
in advance. Different libraries operate different systems, and some
are easier to get into than others. The British Library do their
best to put you off (they actually say so), and a lot of time is
lost once you arriv
Greetings!
>> ¡I'm in Madrid!
>> ¿Do you have some recommendations,
>> lutistical or not?
> PRADO, PRADO, PRADO. Toledo is an hour away. Try to get also to
> Cuenca (3 hrs)
> Anything a la plancha, queso de Burgos con miel.
> RT
Cuenca is only away 12 minutes by plane, but we didn't land.
Queso d
What a request, although the original request was for the one "we lutenists
respect most" of the non-lute, non-Renaissance . In the spirit of the
answers I'll agree with Bach, but toss in Vivaldi. But as the thread has
seemed to come to some of the more modern I'll stick my oar in - with the
caveat
Hildegard was a butcher?
I rather enjoy her being listed as "post-renaissance" composer. A
certain way of truth shines through ...
Thomas
Am Don, 2004-04-01 um 06.51 schrieb Roman Turovsky:
> >
> > with Hildegard v. Bingen,
> Did this butcher ever compose???
> RT
--
Thomas Schall
Nied
Hi Arto,
there is lute music by Corelli (and also Händel)! Arrangements most
likely as the lute music by Telemann, Haydn and Josquin are, too.
Best wishes
Thomas
Am Don, 2004-04-01 um 08.33 schrieb Arto Wikla:
> Hi all
>
> On Wednesday 31 March 2004 20:48, Herbert Ward wrote:
> > Which non-lut
45 matches
Mail list logo
