Dan Winheld wrote:
Hi Edward,
Actually, guitarists have been using tab for decades.
yes, but without rhythm marks ;-)
Andy
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
Well, not for the 6 string guitar as such. But the 18th/early 19th
century 6 course mandora/gallichon was mostly tuned in the identical
intervals (and by this date at the same nominal pitch with first course
at e') as the 6 string guitar and its music was mostly intabulated so
you
lute tablature editions of CG music exist? I find some of the Sor stuff
Much of the free guitar music on the internet is in tabs. Classical
music too. With rhythm notated too. Many publishers publish their
guitar music in staff and tab. Classical music too.
But it's 'guitar tab', that's
There are tons of classical guitar pieces in tabs, WITH rythm signs.
(Dirk Meineke web site for example and many more). Most are using
guitar pro or tabledit.
I'm often playing romantic guitar from tabs (but I always check the
original scores because many errors occurs, same as
On reflection, the first sentence of mailing below should better read:
'Well, not for the contemporary (ie early 19th century) 6 string guitar
as such'. Tho' even this needs to be qualified since there are a few
contemporary tablatures for 6 course guitar. For example those by
On 23/04/2013 04:36, Edward Chrysogonus Yong wrote:
Chaps,
just a random silly thought. There're plenty of classical guitar players who
play lute music in CG transcriptions, but does the reverse exist? Obviously
those who're CG players can play on the lute directly from the CG staff
On 04/23/2013 03:39 AM, WALSH STUART wrote:
On 23/04/2013 04:36, Edward Chrysogonus Yong wrote:
Chaps,
just a random silly thought. There're plenty of classical guitar players who
play lute music in CG transcriptions, but does the
reverse exist? Obviously those who're CG players can play on
One thing we shouldn't lose sight of here. Like Bruce Lee pointing at
the moon and reciting the old Zen wisdom of Do not mistake the finger
pointing at the moon for the moon itself, we must likewise keep in mind
that we are talking of the re-creation -in sound- of aural documents
that were
And, to make an important point with less philosophistry- Let's go back
in time for a minute to the original composer in action. Francesco,
Marco, Sylvius- whoever. From brain to manuscript paper mistakes can
creep in. Off to the publisher/editor- more mistakes creep in. Off to
the printer-
On 04/23/2013 11:37 AM, Dan Winheld wrote:
One thing we shouldn't lose sight of here. Like Bruce Lee pointing at the moon and
reciting the old Zen wisdom of Do not mistake
the finger pointing at the moon for the moon itself, we must likewise keep in
mind that we are talking of the re-creation
Very well put, Dan. Thank you for this very important point, and your
words should be recited aloud by everyone who cares about playing old
music.
RA
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:37:34 -0700
To: t...@tobiah.org
CC: s.wa...@ntlworld.com; edward.y...@gmail.com;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMn8-fQTJtM
The road in in the video leads to a village with the absurdly quaint
name of Newton Blossomville.
Stuart
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
http://youtu.be/HxZXUbYr_8g
with Peter Damsma!
Enjoy!
Amities,
RT
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
Yes, mistakes, and perhaps more significantly a regularization,
enforced by the limits of the notational system, of what may have been
a fluid creation in the mind/voice/hands of the composer. I have a
friend, the archguitarist Peter Blanchette, who plays Dowland
magnificently, but
Indeed- Dowland himself never played a note-perfect fossilized version
of any of his works, just versions that were even more note-perfect; his
own music in his own time, in his own way at the moment of performance-
not feeling the weight of 300+ years of neglect, followed by scholarship
high
15 matches
Mail list logo
