[LUTE] Re: CLM 68

On 22/01/2017 19:46, Rainer wrote: Nothing new... Rainer Well next time I won't bother then. Matthew To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

[LUTE] Re: CLM 68

Nothing new... Rainer On 22.01.2017 19:43, Matthew Daillie wrote: You can read Diana Poulton's argumentation on page 172 of her book on Dowland.

[LUTE] Re: CLM 68

You can read Diana Poulton's argumentation on page 172 of her book on Dowland. https://books.google.fr/books?id=gM4ikvRR4Z0C=PA172=PA172=dowland+Aloe=bl=-vut7Vvh87=nEJtzPUKm2eGhvsxwdhOOJ9_wY4=en=X=0ahUKEwi-4_K7r9bRAhVL1RoKHc5ABH8Q6AEIPjAH#v=onepage=dowland%20Aloe=false She speaks of a ballad

[LUTE] CLM 68

Dear lute netters, does anybody know why this is still called Aloe? Diana Poulton read the title in Trumbull as "Aloe" which is certainly wrong as Ward noticed 40 years ago. I can't see any connection to a non-existing tune based on a wrong title. Have I missed any other "evidence"? Best