Thanks, everyone!
Leonard
On 3/1/17, 8:59 AM, "Leonard Williams" wrote:
>Can anyone recommend a good online string calculator? I used to use
>Arto's, but I'm currently being blocked by Java on my Mac (running Sierra
>? OS 10.12). Or perhaps someone more tech savvy than I (easily done!)
>know
> On Mar 1, 2017, at 7:33 AM, Rob MacKillop wrote:
>
> Very good video, Arto!
I didn’t much care for the piece he played.
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> On Mar 1, 2017, at 12:12 PM, Bruno Cognyl-Fournier
> wrote:
>
> 3. part of the problem may also be due to the enormous amount of
> stretch between peg and nut, so I will try a gut leader to reduce
> that...
Gut is not what you want for this purpose, because it stretches. You want
somet
OK, so I did what Mimmo mentioned in his latest video, I stretched the
string from the 12th fret a couple of times, retuned, stretched again ,
etc. and I did get it pretty damn close to proper pitch. So the
problem lies in the super elasticity of the CD. but there is a memory
on t
Dear collective wisdom and bottomless resource,
Would someone on this list be kind enought to send me a pdf copy of the
following article :
Todd Lane, "The Lute Quartets in the Thysius Lute Book", Journal of the Lute
society of America 12 (1989), pp. 28 - 59.
Thank you in advance for your help
I use Paul Beier's softaware which can be downloaded there :
http://www.musico.it/lute_software/StringCalculator.html
Best wishes,
Jean-Marie
--
>Can anyone recommend a good online string calculator? I used to use
>Arto's, but I'm currently being blocked by Java on my Mac (running
Simple physics: the strings are not uniform along their lengths,
something that is actually difficult to achieve but something we have
become accustomed to with newer more sophisticated methods of making
strings.
A. John Mardinly, Ph.D., P.E.
Retired Principal Materials Nanoanaly
My apologies, this is not a reply to this email.
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Christopher Stetson
<[1]christophertstet...@gmail.com> wrote:
Of course, I'll take over the driving. Sorry to have caused concern.
Chris.
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Dan Winheld <[2]dwinh..
Of course, I'll take over the driving. Sorry to have caused concern.
Chris.
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Dan Winheld <[1]dwinh...@lmi.net>
wrote:
Fellow luters, I have found the perfect piece of music for
thoroughly vetting a 6th course (and 5th , also) for intonation
Fellow luters, I have found the perfect piece of music for thoroughly
vetting a 6th course (and 5th , also) for intonation up the neck. This
one will really let you know if your bass & octave can truly cut it!
And a great workout for you and your lute in any case.
Marco Dall'Aquila, #9 from
Also on Dan Larson's "Gamut" website:
http://www.gamutstrings.com/calculators/calculator.htm
On 3/1/2017 5:59 AM, Leonard Williams wrote:
Can anyone recommend a good online string calculator? I used to use
Arto's, but I'm currently being blocked by Java on my Mac (running Sierra
— OS 10.12).
Very good video, Arto!
Rob
On 1 March 2017 at 15:29, Arto Wikla <[1]wi...@cs.dartmouth.edu> wrote:
Hi lute gang and Bruno
Bruno and others had problems in getting Aquila loaded nylgut CD and
normal NNG strings work well in tune, when used as a pair
fundamental-octave.
[1]http://www.niskanenlutes.com/index.php?p=stringcalc works well
2017-03-01 10:00 GMT-05:00 Arto Wikla <[2]wi...@cs.dartmouth.edu>:
Neither I dare let Java applets run, but my most simple calculator
runs in JavaScript, see
[3]https://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/wikla/mus/Calcs/m
Hi lute gang and Bruno
Bruno and others had problems in getting Aquila loaded nylgut CD and
normal NNG strings work well in tune, when used as a pair
fundamental-octave. I have had no problem in this.
Here is the proof:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVmmPulDLVc&feature=youtu.be
The strin
Buno, came here and we will have space to take some good red wine or white
prosecco, because I am in veneto and the Prosecco is the king here. Ah, and
some hand made foods, of course.
I have done a video for my FB were i have done some tests: my setup has not
this kind of problem. However this
Neither I dare let Java applets run, but my most simple calculator runs
in JavaScript, see
https://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/wikla/mus/Calcs/mc.html
I use that, but you'll certainly find more advanced calculators, too.
Arto
On 01/03/17 15:59, Leonard Williams wrote:
Can anyone recommend a good o
Can anyone recommend a good online string calculator? I used to use
Arto's, but I'm currently being blocked by Java on my Mac (running Sierra
OS 10.12). Or perhaps someone more tech savvy than I (easily done!)
knows a work-around.
Thanks and regards,
Leonard Williams
To get on or off this
Guys,
This discussion is not about whether one should use pythagorean or
equal temperament, it is about two strings in octavbles on the same
course not being in tune together, by the time I've reached 5th fret,
and the dissonance increases as I go beyond 5th fret. the only change
Yes, sometime my english is too fluent.
well you understood correctly.
example:
1.40 mm for the bass
.70 mm for the octave
This mean exactly an equal tension.
But when you install them the octavestring drop its gauge more than the
140. In practice the best solution is to install a 73 instead
Mimmo,
Just to see if I have understood you correctly, please confirm or correct the
following statement, which tries to put your explanation in another way:
If you want to have the octave at the same tension as the fundamental, you must
choose a string whose thickness (before it is stretched)
Sorry, I meant 'pure', not 'perfect'.
Best
Matthew
> On Mar 1, 2017, at 9:43, Matthew Daillie wrote:
>
> None of the intervals are perfect in equal temperament (they all 'beat'). I
> agree with the the major third on the open strings of a modern guitar being
> classed as an imperfect consona
None of the intervals are perfect in equal temperament (they all 'beat'). I
agree with the the major third on the open strings of a modern guitar being
classed as an imperfect consonance, but Ron describes it as being 'dissonant'.
Best
Matthew
> On Mar 1, 2017, at 9:18, Lex van Sante wrote:
>
In the "dark times", actually medieval times, they used the Pythagorean
tuning, in which the major third is even larger than in the equal
temperament. That third really is very dissonant!
Arto
On 01/03/17 10:18, Lex van Sante wrote:
The major third is a dissonance in equal temperament because
I have another opinion.In order to preserve the so called equal feel of
tension the octave string of the two of the course must have more tension
then the bass string. I suggest around 5% more. Why? because even if you
calculated the two strings of the course with the same tension the thin
oct
Dear All,
A few points which might help clarify the discussion:
Maybe the problem with the CD string is is has stretched more in the
section on the fingerboard than the section nearer the bridge - as Mimmo
says, a good test is to turn the string round.
No problem with having equal tension oc
The major third is a dissonance in equal temperament because it is way too big.
Even the perfect major third was considered to be an imperfect consonance in
the dark ages.
Lex
> Op 1 mrt. 2017, om 09:03 heeft Matthew Daillie het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Could you explain what you mean Ron, I
Could you explain what you mean Ron, I don't understand this at all. Why do you
say the interval of a third is a dissonant interval?
Best
Matthew
> On Mar 1, 2017, at 5:13, Ron Andrico wrote:
>
> 3) It's not the g string on guitar that is the cause of the tuning
> problem, stiff though it may
perhaps your octaves are too weak: low tension means in fact
inharmonicity in may occurences. Also with higher tension the string
need to be thicker: the difference of section between bass and octave
is smaller, and much more easy to be in tune when fingered in higher
position.
Le
28 matches
Mail list logo