Dear all,
   Just a short note on my experience of the German theorbo.
   Weiss states in his letters to Mattheson that the instrument has the
   same size as the Italian theorbo,
   and that it ´s unsuitable for galanterie (solo) pieces. Andreas
   Schlegel has listed four surviving instruments
   which are suitable candidates. Three of them have a string length over
   85 cm for the petit jeu, and three of them
   a diapason length over 160 cm. Thus I render the possibility to have
   them double strung throughout rather impossible.
   This goes - as Danny has already pointed out- hand in hand with the
   description of this instrument from Baron- double fretboard strings (as
   opposed to the old ones who were usually single, according to Baron)
   and single basses.
   My instrument (after Schelle, Nuremberg) is 85/170, and I can assure
   you that trying to play solo music on this ( which would have to be
   modern arrangements, since no solo music was ever written for this
   theorbo ) is indeed nonsense.
   It is 100% a continuo instrument.
   The only solo stuff one could play would be the obligato orchestral
   parts written by Hasse, Heinichen and Gebel, but these are all very
   different from lute solo repertoire from this time. The size, but also
   the sound (which Weiss states as harsh and rude since often played with
   nails) is apt and works wonderful in big halls, but for the chamber,
   the klangfarbe isn ´t exactly sweet...
   To give you an impression, here is a clip when a German theorbo is
   played, with nails, in a big concert hall with orchestra (Akademie für
   alte Musik, Berlin).
   [1]Akademie für Alte Musik Berlin na festivalu Pražské jaro

                                [youtube.png]

      Akademie für Alte Musik Berlin na festivalu Pražské jaro

 Koncert nÄmeckého komornÃho orchestru Akademie für Alte Musik Berlin
              svou dramaturgii stavà na hudbÄ pÅedstavite...

   And a visit to Andi Schlegel ´s website (in German) is always also
   highly recommendable:
   [2]http://www.accordsnouveaux.ch/de/Instrumente/DtTheorbe/DtTheorbe.htm
   l
   Best,
   Magnus

   On Tuesday, March 12, 2019, 11:15:04 PM GMT+1, <r.turov...@gmail.com>
   wrote:
     Maciej Konczak plays one,
     as heard here -
     [1][3]https://youtu.be/H7KrfGtV1jg
     RT
     ====
     [2][4]http://turovsky.org
     Feci quod potui. Faciant meliora potentes.
     On Mar 12, 2019, at 1:09 PM, Daniel Shoskes
   <[3][5]kidneykut...@gmail.com>
     wrote:
     It's a d minor tuned "German theorbo" so the double courses in the
     treble feel comfortable and familiar as any Jauck lute. I've tried
   the
     basses single strung (as mentioned by Baron) and with the octaves and
     do like the double strung octaves better. Played near the bridge I
     don't feel a loss of volume with the octaves. Again, a very niche
     instrument played by only a few enthusiasts around the world (Hoppy,
     Benjamin Narvey and Magnus Andersson I believe).
     Danny
       On Mar 12, 2019, at 11:58 AM, Martin Shepherd
       <[4][6]mar...@luteshop.co.uk> wrote:
       Hi Danny,
       I'd forgotten about that awful bent wrist many guitarists have  -
   it
       makes mine hurt just to think about it!
       How do you find the double strung theorbo?  I made one a couple of
       years ago (88cm on the petit jeu) and was surprised by the sound
   and
       feel.  It was more lutelike of course, but the sound was
       surprisingly metallic, especially when played with the thumb out
   and
       near the bridge.  Historically, even the biggest instruments were
       usually double strung - I wonder what a 99cm one would be like?
       All the best,
       Martin
       On 12/03/2019 14:15, Daniel Shoskes wrote:
       Martin: I see no contradiction between being genuinely interested
   in
       what historical lutes sounded like and how they were played and my
       comments below which agree with Besard that if your hand canââ¬â¢t
       physically achieve the ideal position, you can make adjustments.
   The
       classical guitar comment referred to how I played CG in my youth
       with the thumb out and the wrist internally rotated, a position
   that
       I can no longer sustain on the CG and which I agree is not
       synonymous with thumb out lute technique. I do agree that as more
       players experiment with thumb out while also trying to replicate
       what we know or suspect about distance from the bridge and gut
       string tension that it may change how we hear and interpret the
       music.
       You might be pleased to know however that my theorbo is double
       strung in gut!
       Danny
       On Mar 12, 2019, at 8:44 AM, Martin Shepherd
       <[5][7]mar...@luteshop.co.uk> wrote:
       I'm genuinely interested in what historical lutes sounded like and
       how they were played, so I'm not so interested in a "whatever works
       for you" approach, however popular it may be, along with single
       strung "archlutes", microscopic theorboes, and other horrors which
       are nothing to do with historical evidence.
       I think if there is a "dominant" lute technique it is "thumb
       out"(TO), because it certainly existed in the 16th C and became the
       normal technique from c.1600 on.  But when I look at the
       iconography, like Jurgen I see fingers at right angles to the
       strings, and even a suggestion that strings were approached from
       beneath (as happens when I try this position, because my middle
       finger is long compared to the others).  Nails, even if very short,
       come into the picture too.  So I think we have a long way to go to
       appreciate the sound and technique of TO, and (as with the first
       attempts at TU in the 1970s) we have a lot of experimentation to do
       to arrive at something which feels natural and efficient.  It's not
       just a question of reverting to "classical guitar" technique -
       whatever you conceive that to be - but a more difficult process of
       exploration and experimentation.
       Martin
       On 12/03/2019 11:48, Daniel Shoskes wrote:
       Jà �rgen: Absolutely hit the nail on the head. Itââ¬â¢s all
   about the
       sound and people have different hand anatomy and physiology.
       Iconography and fingering is an important starting point but if it
       doesnââ¬â¢t fit your hand (and nail growth) it 
shouldnââ¬â¢t stop
   you
       from playing the music you want. Have seen and heard fantastic 6
       course performances thumb under, but also thumb out with pi on
   runs.
       Ronn McF has one of the best right hands in the business and plays
       with great speed and tone color variation playing thumb under on
   his
       10 course. Best baroque lute concert I heard last year saw the
   right
       thumb sneaking under the index when they crossed. Brilliant West
       Coast baroque band led by an archlute playing thumb under.
   Iââ¬â¢ve
       also heard awful thumb under 6 course playing and painfully poor
       baroque lute thumb out playing.
       Whatââ¬â¢s more important than thumb position? Hitting both
   courses
       cleanly with good tone and volume control, strong weak alternation
       in the appropriate music whether pi or im, playing ââ¬Årest
   strokeââ¬
       � on baroque instruments as default and as a rare special effect
   on
       earlier instruments, bringing out dance rhythms and polyphony when
       present, using ornamentation and improvisation, savoring the sound
       of low tension gut strings. If you need to play Renaissance music
       thumb out, have at it. If you have a short thumb and canââ¬â¢t get
   it
       out comfortably, focus on sound production and playing musically
   and
       all is well. Iââ¬â¢ve been given that advice in lessons and
       masterclasses by numerous teachers. I have both a short thumb and a
       wrist injured by decades of doing vascular and microsurgery and the
       full thumb out of my classical guitar days is painful and prevents
       my fingers from getting a decent sound. i wonââ¬â¢t let that stop
   me
       from enjoying all my in!
     s!
       truments, from my 4 course Re!
       n!
       ai!
       ssance guitar to my 13 course German theorbo.
       Danny
       On Mar 12, 2019, at 2:50 AM, Jurgen Frenz
       <[6][8]eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com> wrote:
       Having acquired an 8c lute in late December makes the subject
       incredible relevant to me. I hope nobody is offended when I put
   down
       some personal practical observations without referring to historic
       evidence.
       The entire hand position needs to be different, I think. (1) As it
       is possible to play p-i lines on all courses doing so with m-i ends
       for me somewhere on the middle F string - the inside of the hand
       would just mute the high g string because of the pinky that is
       planted on the sound board with my European average hand. (2)
       Playing distinctive bass lines on the 7th and 8th course while
       playing m-i on the upper courses forces (I believe) the hand to
   turn
       more like 45 degrees or so towards the strings and not any longer
       "almost parallel" as is practical for earlier music.
       The challenge to me is to produce a "gentle" sound and finger nails
       are a more urgent matter than playing on a 6c lute thumb out. From
       what people say here I conclude that this is quite a personal
       matter, individuals have different nail growth and sound ideals.
       Or would you just lift the pinky? I don't think so because it is
   the
       GPS sensor for string geography.
       On the images in Jean-Marie's links I find it surprising that the
       hand is actually almost at 90 degrees to the strings, quite like
       classical guitar players but the hand is placed at the corner of
   the
       bridge, miles away from the rosette. Once again, placing the hand
       there would automatically turn the hand around even further.
       Best regards
       Jà �rgen
       ----------------------------------
       ââ¬ÅThere is a voice that doesnââ¬â¢t use words. 
Listen.â⬠�
       Jalà �l ad-Dà �n Muhammad Rumi
       To get on or off this list see list information at
       [7][9]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
       <[8][10]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html>
       ---
       This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
   software.
       [9][11]https://www.avast.com/antivirus
       <[10][12]https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
       --
     --
   References
     1. [13]https://youtu.be/H7KrfGtV1jg
     2. [14]http://turovsky.org/
     3. mailto:[15]kidneykut...@gmail.com
     4. mailto:[16]mar...@luteshop.co.uk
     5. mailto:[17]mar...@luteshop.co.uk
     6. mailto:[18]eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com
     7. [19]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
     8. [20]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
     9. [21]https://www.avast.com/antivirus
     10. [22]https://www.avast.com/antivirus

   --

References

   Visible links:
   1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=410&v=pN6bUfoB1Hk
   2. http://www.accordsnouveaux.ch/de/Instrumente/DtTheorbe/DtTheorbe.html
   3. https://youtu.be/H7KrfGtV1jg
   4. http://turovsky.org/
   5. mailto:kidneykut...@gmail.com
   6. mailto:mar...@luteshop.co.uk
   7. mailto:mar...@luteshop.co.uk
   8. mailto:eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com
   9. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  10. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  11. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
  12. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
  13. https://youtu.be/H7KrfGtV1jg
  14. http://turovsky.org/
  15. mailto:kidneykut...@gmail.com
  16. mailto:mar...@luteshop.co.uk
  17. mailto:mar...@luteshop.co.uk
  18. mailto:eye-and-ear-cont...@protonmail.com
  19. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  20. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  21. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
  22. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

   Hidden links:
  24. https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=410&v=pN6bUfoB1Hk

Reply via email to