[LUTE] Re: Hidalgo Fret pattern

2016-01-02 Thread David Van Edwards
Dear Andreas, On your Hidalgo question, as people have been pointing out it is a treatise on perspective not on fretting. So he even has the division of the stringlength wrong for fretting purposes. He says divide the stringlength into 16 parts whereas the the nearest whole number

[LUTE] Re: Hidalgo Fret pattern

2016-01-02 Thread Antonio Corona
It is an engraving from JosA(c) GarcAa Hidalgo`s Principios para estudiar el nobilAsimo y real arte de la pintura (Madrid, 1693), intending to show in perspective a rule on how to fret instruments (unfortunately the proportions are wrong). There is a modern edition, Valencia,

[LUTE] Re: Hidalgo Fret pattern

2016-01-01 Thread David Morales
Here you have a fast translation to modern spanish (first reading). Hope that helps and btw an interesting picture. In general, the text is not related to painting or perspective, it is all about how to put frets on plucked instruments. Acerca de entrastar todo gA(c)nero de

[LUTE] Re: Hidalgo Fret pattern

2016-01-01 Thread David Morales
Sorry, lost in translation :) it's all about how to draw frets on instruments, just following the right pattern about distances and number of frets. El 1 de enero de 2016, 22:48, David Morales <[1]dmorale...@cuerdaspulsadas.com> escribiA^3: Here you have a fast translation to

[LUTE] Re: Hidalgo Fret pattern

2016-01-01 Thread M Hall
I think he is not really concerned with tying frets. What he is illustrating is Rules of perspective when drawing frets on the fingerboard. He starts off by saying that the distance between the bridge and the nut is divided into 16 parts starting from point E on the drawing. It is not very easy