[LUTE] Re: RH on the bridge [baroque Method]

2008-01-10 Thread Rob
. Museums, of course, tend to just like records of the state of the instrument, not what it should be like if restored. www.rmguitar.info -Original Message- From: Anthony Hind [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 January 2008 21:51 To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Net Subject: [LUTE] Re: RH

[LUTE] Re: RH on the bridge [baroque Method]

2008-01-10 Thread Anthony Hind
like records of the state of the instrument, not what it should be like if restored. www.rmguitar.info -Original Message- From: Anthony Hind [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 January 2008 21:51 To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Net Subject: [LUTE] Re: RH on the bridge [baroque Method] Thanks Rob

[LUTE] Re: RH on the bridge [baroque Method]

2008-01-09 Thread Anthony Hind
Thanks for trying, Rob. It shows how careful you have to be even when reading information on a museum site. I thought that would be completely trustworthy. Actually, it is surprising that there are often very strong little finger marks on historic lutes. Modern players, do their best to

[LUTE] Re: RH on the bridge [baroque Method]

2008-01-09 Thread Rob
: Anthony Hind [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 January 2008 18:12 To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Net Subject: [LUTE] Re: RH on the bridge [baroque Method] Thanks for trying, Rob. It shows how careful you have to be even when reading information on a museum site. I thought that would be completely

[LUTE] Re: RH on the bridge [baroque Method]

2008-01-09 Thread Anthony Hind
Message- From: Anthony Hind [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 January 2008 18:12 To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Net Subject: [LUTE] Re: RH on the bridge [baroque Method] Thanks for trying, Rob. It shows how careful you have to be even when reading information on a museum site. I thought that would