Am I missing something here? Surely one just reads the messages as far
back as suits the individual: this may be just the previous mail or the
whole thread. Otherwise, surely there's a danger of useful bits getting
lost for someone who picks it up at a later stage...
MH
On Friday, 28 June 2019, 15:23:24 BST, Leonard Williams
<arc...@cs.dartmouth.edu> wrote:
Perhaps simply placing a response before the original message
would
be simple, and it would preserve the continuity and context of the
thread for anyone who has deleted, or not received, the original
message.
Alternatively, interspersing responses with appropriate portions
of
the original message would at least preserve context.
Not without guilt,
Leonard Williams
--
To get on or off this list see list information at
[1]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
--
References
1. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
