[LUTE-BUILDER] Re: Why no mahogany?

2012-05-03 Thread Jon Murphy
Bill and Ted, I think the nature of mahogany would be counter to the needs of the lute ribs. I've had mahogany bodied guitars, but the form of the lute and the sound production is different. As a joining piece between the ribs it should work, but the resonating body of the lute is different

[LUTE-BUILDER] Re: Why no mahogany?

2012-05-03 Thread Mustafa Umut Sarac
Mahagony widely used at Gibson Les Paul electric guitars and Rickenbacker basses. All these instruments are deepest godly sounding instruments with lots of sustain. I dont think there is a room for this wood at lute construction. And it is very heavy and color is hot with deep

[LUTE-BUILDER] Re: Why no mahogany?

2012-05-03 Thread Martyn Hodgson
Dear Bill, Never used the material for ribs and the like, but a few random thoughts come to mind: There are, of course, many types of mahogany and not all are classed as 'true' mahogany so we must be careful about over-generalising but having said that, compared to

[LUTE-BUILDER] Re: Why no mahogany?

2012-05-02 Thread Woodford
Bill, Mahogany as an export timber arrived on the scene fairly late in terms of lute construction. Very little of it made its way into European cabinetry shops until the 18th century. Most of the mahogany growing at that time was in areas controlled by Spain and in 1622 Cuban mahogany was